To keep Tanny or NOT?

One was a blowout loss, did you not catch that?

Plus 3 games in 5 years isn’t really even considered a success rate.

 

Completion percentage is dumb imo but throughout their careers mariotas and tannenhills are basically the same at 63 percent. so that last game was an outlier. But the majority of is passes were short and didnt go fa .

 

Way to change it up. So they are about the same but THill’s best games = MM avg games.

 

PFF TEN Titans@PFF_Titans

Ryan Tannehill’s grade of 79.5 on Sunday was higher than any grade for Marcus Mariota going back to week 10 of the 2018 season (87.3)#TitanUp

 

I don't know if we keep him or not, but if he should continue to win and move the offense the way he did against SD (and I'm still not convinced that was a great barometer of success as yet), then they won't have much choice but to sign him and look at drafting a QB. Trouble with winning is we drift further from a higher draft pick. I want to see team win ultimately, so if that means Tanny is successful and we resign him then so be it.

 

Mariota throws for 300 yards, 80% completion rate, and 120 QB rating on an average day. That doesn't sound right to you?

 

I wouldn’t mind if Tannehill just ended up being the guy . Not sure what the chances of that happening are though but it would be such a relief not to to have to start completely over at qb .

 

Something worth noting is that 7 different players caught passes and had double digit yardage against LA. In Mariota's 2 best games, only 3 players eclipsed double digit receiving yardage, and 1 did so on a 75 yard screen pass. It's like, the number of receivers doubled with Tannehill under center.

 

That's about right, roughly half the league