Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by jessestylex, Jul 5, 2011.
exactly and she can go ahead and confess to the murder now because she cannot be tried again.
She's young and attractive. I remember the Audrey Seiler (college chick that faked her own kidnapping) story blowing up on every news station and was front news on every paper when it went down.
So she got an offer to do p0rn.
We can only hope she never ever gets pregnant again.
well she was found guilty after all, misleading prosecutors. Isn't that kinda what got that ratbird lewis in prison. Either way she can't be tried for the murder again so that sucks.
Wow a bunch of you come across as brain dead idiots in this thread.
Let's take a look at this.
Her daughter was missing for 31 days. No phone call to the police. She didn't tell a soul about it for a freaking month.
What did she do? Go out partying.
Does this not stink of guilt to you people? How can you ignore that in any way shape or form?
Secondly, the shape of the body was it was discovered. Essentially a skeleton. What kind of evidence is going to be had from that? Hardly anything. So how can you blame the prosecution? They did what they could with the little evidence they had.
She was guilty. Pure and simple. No sane or innocent person goes 31 days without reporting their child missing. And you say the prosecution failed? No the jury committed a colossal mistake.
Also. You don't get a death sentence for manslaughter. Not all of the possibilities included a death sentence. I see most of you getting hung up on the possibility of a death sentence and conveniently forgot that was not the only possibility to happen.
Some of the jurors have came out saying they thought she did it. Well if you thought she did it you ing convict her of manslaughter at the very least. She was obviously pretty damn guilty of that.
I guess Florida is the home of the most retarded people in our population.
How can the jurors come to the conclusion that she was guilty of misleading the police/obstructing justice, but that she wasn't the guilty party in her daughter's murder? Do they allow "special" people on the jury down there or something? Wow....
Before you start calling people idiots, perhaps you should learn the meaning of guilt and how your example is quite the opposite of guilt.
there was enough evidence , the Jury was a bunch of idiot monkeys who where swinging from the lights and eating bananas the whole time. prob made up of young adults with no kids who had no feelings, or some dudes like all of you who didnt care about Caylee and just wanted to make a joke out of the whole thing to make people mad. the Jury should have been made up of 30-40 year old mothers and 70 year old grandpas. instead they picked heartless morons.
Jesse where is your outrage over this case?
^ i dont care abut adult drunks at bars.
Caylee was a helpless 2 year old girl that was prob watching cartoons when Casey decided to end her life.
My theory: I don't thing Casey decided to kill her baby. I think she was probably drunk and not watching the little girl and she fell in the pool and drowned. When she sobered up and found her dead, she tried to keep it from her parents. When the step father eventually found out, he used his police knowledge to dispose of the body in a way to erase evidence.
The prosecution could have gone with that theory and a lesser charge without the death penalty and Casey would have gone to prison for 30 years.