So guys, about those last two games....

Smashmouth for 3 years??? His first year, Palmer wanted to use a run and shoot. Hass and that offense, on a weaker schedule, went 9-7.

The following year, its Lockers year. However he cant run Palmers offense, its asking too much, especially with no running game (which I will get to in a minute). So Palmer is fired by Munch/Weber. Then, realizing that we need to build a running game to help Locker be successful (something the coaches/front office noticed), so they try to build around the run.

No coach is going to come in here and sprinke pixie dust on this offensive line and make it magical. Levitre has been a disappointment, we find out next year how much the injury played into it. Warmack struggled as well. If thats Munch's fault, then youre entitled to believe that.

Munch and Weber obviously work together, just like all GM's and coaches do. The GM is ultimately responsible for who is signed and let go. (which is why some coaches want GM powers)

When weighing all the options and different scenarios, its not hard for me to understand why TS went this direction, whether you agree with it or not.

If the offensive line problem is the reason you want Munch gone and you think he is to blame for it, then at least you have a reason, whether I agree with it or not.

 

Yeah man, but he's made some great moves if you ask me and he's been saying all the right things. I understand there is enough blame to go around I guess, but he's been (to my knowledge) the only bright star in the FO, so I will def defend him to the max.

 

You don't need to defend him unless you are suggesting he is perfect.

 

This is my opinion exactly. I'm finding it hard to further convey this, and I see your point SawdustMan, but like TJ said this is a turd that can't be shined enough.

It's a business, and TS wants to win. He knows it just as well as you and I that those last two games were crap shoots and we barely won them. Gosh, when you think about it, it's not even about winning or losing those games. It's about how we looked as a team. We looked bad and because of that I believe we are in this awkward silence here today about Munch's future.

My hunch is that these last two games didn't decide if Munch was fired or not, but how he was going to be fired. Quick and simple with those two loses, or awkward, complicated, and forced behind the scenes.

I do believe we are seeing the latter.

 

NOPE! lol we are keeping this sucker around for the entire off season