new Star Trek trailer

Discussion in 'Movies/TV' started by Puck, Nov 15, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Puck

    Puck Pro Bowler

    13,050
    451
    539
    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/I0WNPb8R-40&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/I0WNPb8R-40&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
    #1
  2. onetontitan

    onetontitan Marioto

    6,471
    1,362
    479
    looks LAME AS HELL
    #2
  3. avvie

    avvie Simply one Hell of a butler Tip Jar Donor

    10,228
    1,388
    829
    Tough call.

    I'm not expecting an Abrams film to suck... the question is: will Trekkie purists be offended at the attempt to recast the original crew? Who is the more legendary: Kirk and Spock, or Shatner and Nimoy?

    I'm not a trekkie, so i don't care.
    #3
  4. Bobo

    Bobo Guest

    I'll give it a chance fo sho. Could be a winker ;) Could be a stinker :hitfan:
    #4
  5. Yossarian

    Yossarian I am Him.

    4,064
    350
    199
    and the other star trek movies weren't?
    #5
  6. The Playmaker

    The Playmaker pineapple pizza party

    15,112
    3,048
    909
    looks good

    never cared for trek though
    #6
  7. Bobo

    Bobo Guest

    Are you kiddin me?

    [​IMG]
    #7
  8. CRUDS

    CRUDS The secret is the meat! Staff

    22,192
    6,575
    939
    As long they don't cast Hayden Christianson or feature a ******* Jar Jar Binks CGI type character it will still be better than the last 3 Star Wars movies...
    #8
  9. Childress79

    Childress79 Loungefly ® Tip Jar Donor

    8,305
    1,704
    729
    They should have gone with Jack Black as Kirk.:yes:
    #9
  10. Puck

    Puck Pro Bowler

    13,050
    451
    539
    i question the cast
    #10
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.