Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by TheSureThing, Apr 18, 2013.
Youre selfish and a trouble maker, be quiet before we do mess up and take this kid.
I WILL **** PUNT YOU
no I meant with a potential trade down with Minny
If 10 is too high for Hunter and he's supoosedly a better WR than Patterson, then why is 10 not too high for Patterson...keeping in mind I don't follow college football.....so enlighten me SureThing
Oooooo ok, that makes more sense.
I guess I should have typed that....by what I've read, I think Hunter will go before Patterson..he's been compared to Randy Moss and Patterson has "character issues"....but again I have limited knowledge of College ball.
Did anyone see the sports science piece on CP?
They said he could cover more catchable space than Gronk and better reaction time than anyone they tested all year.
Those sports science segments are full of sensationalistic garbage. Every guy they test seems to be some type of superhuman freak. I remember when they compared Chad Johnson's catch radius to an elephant and then Larry Fitzgerald's to an elephant. And I doubt CP's on the field (not in a lab) radius is much bigger than Gronk's. CP may have a higher vert but Gronk is 6'7".
Haha yeah everyone they test is the "fastest/quickest/strongest/most amazing we've ever tested"
The show used to be legit before ESPN bought it out, now its just retarded..
I seen ON ESPN yesterday is the most sudden quick playmaker he has ever graded over cj spliller.
i would rather have austin in the slot & cj at rb & iff britt & wright improve we could be a top 10 o