If Wright, Jeffery, or Hill are there in the 2nd

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by ToddTheTitan, Apr 3, 2012.

  1. griff33daddy

    griff33daddy Special Teams Standout

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,271
    1=kuechly
    2=jeffery
    3=burquette(sp)
    4=harris dt from usc
    5=rainey
    6=vlachos(sp)
    7=small school corner

    ya i'd be happy with that...heck i would be happy seeing if the pats would want to trade back with us and we could take their late first and second and get an extra second too
    #11
  2. Titanic_Sub

    Titanic_Sub Starter

    Joined:
    May 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,467
    I'd be pretty happy with Jeffery in the second.
    #12
  3. Fry

    Fry Hatin' is what I do.

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2004
    Messages:
    26,409
    I'm anti-Jeffery at any point in the draft. The guy can't run. I don't care what he ran at his pro day. Watch him any season, the guy has bricks tied to his feet.

    Stephen Hill can't catch or run routes. He's fast and made a lot of plays against busted coverage because safeties were worried about stopping the triple option.

    I get that people will always be enamored with wide receivers because it's a flashy position, but I'm pretty satisfied with our WR/TE core right now.
    #13
  4. J Falk

    J Falk Starter

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,895
    We already have 2 young possesion recievers. I think we could use a burner more than another possession guy. Nate Washington is that burner right now, but he's getting old. With that said, I'd love if we picked up Kendall Wright.
    #14
  5. Wraith

    Wraith Special Teams Standout

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    Messages:
    288
    to be fair Jeffery was double covered most of the time last year, when he was covered one on one he was able to get good separation, and we have three deep threats in Britt, Washington and Cook. only DWill is a possession type reciever
    #15
  6. The Playmaker

    The Playmaker pineapple pizza party

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    13,048
    Yeah I've been on the Hill bandwagon for a little while now. He won't even be there with our 2nd most likely but he has the size, athleticism, great speed, a hard worker, very good at blocking (see him in triple offense), and his upside is crazy. He does need to work on route running and his catching the ball a bit more but uhm Britt was just as bad when we took him, he even had a concentration problem. Hill is just a taller and faster Britt who is more of a deep threat.
    #16
  7. Titanup1982

    Titanup1982 Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    11,365
    Nate isn't getting old. He is just now getting into his prime.
    #17
  8. Fry

    Fry Hatin' is what I do.

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2004
    Messages:
    26,409
    Britt knew how to run routes and get off the line without getting jammed. Hill is the rawest a guy can be possibly be coming out of an automatic qualifier.

    The Combine, making great athletes millions since it became televised.
    #18
  9. Architect

    Architect Pain Train

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    895
    Wes Bunting at National Football Post has him rated as a 2nd round value

    "WR Mohamed Sanu: Rutgers (6-2, 215)
    Physically reminds me some of Hakeem Nicks. Isn't as NFL ready and lacks the same type of vertical speed, but can go get the football, breakdown and separate on all levels of the field. Looks like a future NFL starter who might need some time, but the talent is most definitely there."

    http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Top-Potential-2nd-Round-Values.html

    Sidenote: Hey guys how do I quote from a website so that it appears in a box, like when I quote another post?
    #19
  10. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,507
    Huh? Who?

    Kenny Britt is a downfield threat.
    Nate Washington is a downfield threat.

    Both are not "possesion recievers"...
    #20