Have at it: Are the Colts bouncing back or broken?

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by NewsGrabber, Oct 7, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. NewsGrabber

    NewsGrabber Guest

    Posted by ESPN.com's Paul Kuharsky Here's my first attempt at an entry some of my colleagues have used with great effect, called "Have at it."
    The Indianapolis Colts keep talking of staying the course and doing what they do, and any team with their track record is going to believe better football is to come.
    But at 2-2 they've looked nothing like the team that's dominated the AFC South for the last five years.
    So I ask you:
    Are the Colts a team that's just a little off, that will be catapulted by Sunday's late turnaround in Houston to better things?
    Or are they a broken team that is getting old at some key spots and that tough opponents will find the formula to handle?
    I welcome your thoughts in the comments section below or in my mailbag. After I sort through them I'll post the best you offer and share some of my own thoughts on the matter.
    Have at it.


    More...
    #1
  2. PitBull

    PitBull Bred to Brawl

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,945
    They rank last in the league in rushing and stopping the run. I say they're broken.
    #2
  3. TheSureThing

    TheSureThing WHY DIDNT YOU DRAFT JOHNNY FOOTBALL?!?

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Messages:
    7,386
    window is about to close, I see this as there last year before age catches up to Manning, Harrison, etc..
    #3
  4. vslyke

    vslyke In Dinger We Trust

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,493
    Broken. They had a great run, now it's our turn.
    #4
  5. Hoffa

    Hoffa Not Family?Then freak you you freakin' freak

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Messages:
    12,770
    They are in the same place we were in 2004. Plagued by injuries the year before the cap really hit us.
    The window has closed, on their fingers...
    #5
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.