Grade Fisher and Reese...

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by rcarie, Jan 16, 2006.

?

What grade would you give Fisher and Reese for the 2005 season?

  1. A

    8.8%
  2. B

    5.9%
  3. C

    35.3%
  4. D

    35.3%
  5. F

    11.8%
  6. Pack it in and fire his ars!!

    2.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. rcarie

    rcarie Tac Head

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,797
    We all know that there are several people who are not fans of the current DC (trust us, we know). This is not a poll involving coordinators so leave them out. Ultimatley Jeff Fisher and Floyd Reese are responsible for this team. Based on that, what kind of grade would you give them (Fisher and Reese) for the 2005 season?



    This is the question posed to sports writers last night on News Channel 5 Sports. Just interested in what people think, though, I have a pretty good Idea...
    #1
  2. TitanJeff

    TitanJeff Kahuna Grande Staff

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,235
    I don't know if it makes sense to give them a combined grade.
    #2
  3. Puck

    Puck Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    13,051
    ok , rcarie

    try for #3 ..... :brow:

    i thought about mentioning separate polls before you deleted the last one

    but , I'l do this again :

    Reese = B- I thought he had a decent draft

    Jeff = C- decent job dealing with strife, but lost the team near the end
    #3
  4. rcarie

    rcarie Tac Head

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,797
    You can grade em how ever you want. This is how they did it last night so I threw it our there. If you want to list seperate grades you can. It's more of a conversation thing than anything else...
    #4
  5. Puck

    Puck Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    13,051
    well, I think it's safe to remove "A"
    #5
  6. KamikaZ

    KamikaZ Ex-Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    5,827
    Fisher - C+

    Reece - C
    #6
  7. Puck

    Puck Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    13,051
    so do i take the sum and then the average ?
    #7
  8. TitanJeff

    TitanJeff Kahuna Grande Staff

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,235
    I'm trying to figure out if we grade Reese on the draft class, the one entering its third season or the overall talent on the team.
    #8
  9. Puck

    Puck Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    13,051
    is there a difference ?
    #9
  10. Nine

    Nine Starter

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2004
    Messages:
    943
    Even if you grade them individually, it's hard to give an accurate assessment...

    For the rookies, I'd give them an A-. Floyd brought in a very talented rookie class, most of whom made considerable contributions throughout the season. Fisher did a great job of coaching up the younger players, and turned the rookie class into some of the team's most consistent and productive players.

    However, if you grade them on their performance with veteran players, I'd have to give them both F's...Fisher in particular. We obviously cast much of the blame on mediocre personnel...which is putting it mildly...but the fact of the matter is, almost every veteran on the team had a career-worst season in 2004. If it was just one or two guys, that would be understandable....but when most of your veteran leaders are playing far below their potential, then there's probably an underlying problem. And obviously, coaching (or the lack thereof) is the one common thread shared by all.
    #10
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.