dwight smith?

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by Fry, Jul 20, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Fry

    Fry Hatin' is what I do.

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2004
    Messages:
    26,232
  2. dontdraftcutler

    dontdraftcutler Go Cutler!

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,725
    yeah ....but, Rosenhaus.?.?.?
    #2
  3. SEC 330 BIPOLAR

    SEC 330 BIPOLAR jive turkey

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    16,087
    for Elf : booHiss lamont!
    #3
  4. Starkiller

    Starkiller 9

    Joined:
    May 30, 2002
    Messages:
    14,957
    No way. We have 2 starters and good (presumably), young depth in Fuller and Lowry.
    #4
  5. Puck

    Puck Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    13,051
    i'd rather use some energy on a quality CB

    I have faith in our 2 young CB's but I do not with the backups

    unless he can come in and play a hybrid then we should keep looking
    #5
  6. Sledge

    Sledge Guest

    Yes he would, but I think he's a FS... I'd still get him and put him at SS if he's a FS

    He's worth every penny, and screw Rosenhaus, he's Volek's agent and that went well..
    #6
  7. Sledge

    Sledge Guest

    Lamont stinks, and the two quality depths are unproven rookies. I say rookie about Fuller cuz he hasn't played a lick
    #7
  8. Sledge

    Sledge Guest

    I doubt you'll find one popup in FA. And there will be a bidding war. Smith might be had pretty cheap (relatively speaking)
    #8
  9. Puck

    Puck Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    13,051
    yeah that may very well be

    but we kinda need a new S like we need a new RB
    #9
  10. Dangermode

    Dangermode A New Era has Begun

    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    874
    I'm sorry, but what does having three thousand yard rushers have to do with having "the other guy from Pittsburg" and "Whose that guy with the dreads chasing him into the endzone?"?

    :lol:
    #10
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.