Dre Bly?

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by Dangermode, Feb 14, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. oochymp

    oochymp Camp Fodder

    1,422
    0
    0
    Idk if I'd do it as a player, a one year deal after which the team can't franchise you, that sounds very similar to the policy of frachising a player, except I'm sure the Bills didn't give him as much money as he would get from the franchise tag.

    And I do know that a team can technically franchise a player two seasons in a row, but the way it works makes doing that very difficult from a financial standpoint.
    #51
  2. It used to be easy to franchise a player year after year (not necessarily cheap, but easy). The new CBA makes it almost impossible though, so players really won't have to worry about being re-franchised anymore...
    #52
  3. oochymp

    oochymp Camp Fodder

    1,422
    0
    0
    not cheap at all, what is it 15%? add 15% to the avg of the top five players at the position, that's the cost of the second franchised year, that's almost enough to make it impossible, has anybody been franchised two years in a row?
    #53
  4. bob45x32

    bob45x32 Starter

    177
    22
    134


    Donavan Darias or however you spell it..
    #54
  5. A few players were. Walter Jones was franchised 3 straight years...
    #55
  6. Puck

    Puck Pro Bowler

    13,051
    451
    539
    didn't we do it to Blaine Bishop ? (i miss that guy)
    #56
  7. We only tagged him once.
    #57
  8. Deuce Wayne

    Deuce Wayne Damnit, I cant find my driving moccasins anywhere!

    28,831
    6,654
    859
    So we had playmakers that showed up for ONE game. We had 28 takeaways. That's about average. I'd rather be within the top 15 in that category.
    #58
  9. Puck

    Puck Pro Bowler

    13,051
    451
    539
    well, since it looks like Samuels is getting tagged, it might be prudent to start talking to Dre
    #59
  10. Dangermode

    Dangermode A New Era has Begun

    939
    15
    134
    :ha: :ha: :ha: :ha:
    #60
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.