Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by 2ToneBlueBlood, Mar 27, 2014.
How so - there nothing alike?
Actually... FACTUALLY speaking, Luck is average at best.
But you keep letting ESPN tell you what's true.
no sir you are they are almost polar opposites
Well he's better than Locker, that's for sure. And everyone around here seems to think Locker is good, so who knows what good really is, and whether it even matters...
I used to think Luck was a great QB....
..until I watched him play against the Patriots in the playoffs. Wow.
Disagree. All I see is a bunch of people saying he could be good - before the injury, the first one. After that, all bets are off.
The Colts are not even close to the same team they were in 2011. You should know better. They have added a ton of players since then, not just Luck.
TY Hilton, Vontae Davis, Cory Redding, Jerrell Freeman, LaRon Landry, Vick Ballard, Gosder Cherilus... None of them were on that scrub 0-13 team. And those are just the players off the top of my head. I won't include scrubs like Richardson that didn't contribute.
And that scrub team lost a lot of games on purpose and had Painter/Orlovsky at QB. If they were trying to win and had an average QB (like Luck or Cutler or Schaub) they would've made it to between 6-8 wins.
Uh. We have Shonn Greene as our starting RB
Separate names with a comma.