A quieted FA stance by the Titans

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by fitantitans, Mar 24, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. maximus

    maximus Camp Fodder

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    3,429
    Earlier this year we might have been able too. However, I believe a second for Volek might have been more reasonable to earlier this year.
    #11
  2. metal957

    metal957 In"Vince"Able

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    529
    When we do selct a QB with the 3rd pick pick we will trade Volek for a 3rd round pick
    #12
  3. LazyManJackson

    LazyManJackson Starter

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Messages:
    2,986
    I feel that is what will happen too and i'm all for it
    #13
  4. titanfan53

    titanfan53 put me in coach

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    161
    new here but i feel he will be traded also even though he was pretty solid for us at back up
    #14
  5. Titans2008

    Titans2008 Camp Fodder

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,525
    Tell me what player we could possibly draft in the 3rd round that is more valuable to us than Volek. That would be a dumb move with Steve moving out the door and Mauck not showing anything to indicate he can be a reliable backup.
    #15
  6. Starkiller

    Starkiller 9

    Joined:
    May 30, 2002
    Messages:
    14,957
    If we draft a QB at #3 overall, then a 3rd round pick would be much more valuable to us over the next 4 years than Volek would be.
    #16
  7. Titans2004

    Titans2004 Starter

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2004
    Messages:
    2,407
    I'd be thrilled getting a 4th for Volek. If Farve decides to hang it up then the Packers are really going to be looking for a vet to compete with Rodgers because currently they are the only 2 QBs on the roster since they lost Nall to buffalo. GB also needs interior line help as well so maybe we could throw in Pillar and get them to give us their high 3rd.
    #17
  8. theprizdfighter

    theprizdfighter Newb to the 19.5°

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2006
    Messages:
    2,320
    If we draft a QB at 3. He'll be second string. Then Volek certainly wouldn't be happy and would force a trade anyways so why not do it draft day for a third rounder?
    #18
  9. Titans2008

    Titans2008 Camp Fodder

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,525
    So all of you people (not me) that are saying Young will not be ready to start for two years. Steve is not going to be around that long, and it is likely that he gets injured this coming season at some point. If Volek isn't there, are you suggesting we start Mauck or throw the rookie into the fire ?
    #19
  10. theprizdfighter

    theprizdfighter Newb to the 19.5°

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2006
    Messages:
    2,320
    I'm not saying he won't be ready in two years. I think he'd be ready after one year, or atleast we should let him start.

    Volek already was talking about a trade this past season. So you think he'd be happier third string? Trade him for a third since we don't have one. Pick up a quality O-lineman which is a need. I'd much rather lose Volek and pickup a quality player in the third, then keep Volek and fish for gem in the 6th and 7th.
    #20
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.