Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by PRAY IV M3RCY, Apr 13, 2017.
Just because I dont agree with your big baby ass doesnt mean Im the dumb one
Lewans the future top lt in the league
Cooks a pretty good rt
who the hell are you even thinking of?
you know what, dont even care, just responding back for the moolah
Conk so barely above average my autocorrect change him to cooks
I think Lewan was clearly better as a rookie than Conklin was
Conk was at RT in his Rookie yer. Lewan was at LT. I think Lewan was challenged a lot more than Conk in his Rookie year.
Ok for fun I'll bite... (slow day at the office today)
Show us with some proof, stats, or SOMETHING to explain how he's just "barely above average"
It's not hard to find stats that show he's in the upper tier but I'd like to see what you have to show that supports your "perspective."
Seriously? Obviously making a joke
I said he's a pretty good rt
Yea and lewan played under whiz who we know didn't believe in any help
Conk under whiz likely don't look so great
Hard to really compare play different positions, however in terms of penalties I remember Lewan got quite a few.
Lewan had 10 penalties, 3 declined for 70 yards
Conklin had 3 for 15 yards.
Conklin had 0 holding penalties, 0 hands to the face (auto first down), and 0 ejections. Not to mention last year Lewan had 12 penalties accepted for 123 yards.
I like Lewan, he's a nasty LT that plays with an edge. Conklin is the quiet hard working guy who just does his job very well. Together they make a great combo, but hard to say he "clearly" had a better rookie year.