Titans O-Line ranked #1

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by titanfanatic, Jan 11, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dtm586

    dtm586 The Master Jedi

    4,637
    1,313
    649
    Have been thinking about making a thread topic on the offensive line alone

    Glad it was pointed out in detail

    From where we all were last year - this o-line play has been Night and day it hasn't been talked about and praised enough IMO
     
    • High Five High Five x 2
  2. Titan Wrath

    Titan Wrath Starter

    159
    39
    134
    Oh I'm not trying to convince anyone Elliot would have been a better pick, anyone that doesn't already know that is a lost cause. End of story.
     
    • Bullsh*t Bullsh*t x 3
    • LOL LOL x 2
    • Boring Boring x 1
  3. kstone

    kstone Starter

    1,633
    419
    429
    Just glad the o line is not trash like it was 2-3 years ago
     
  4. meekmode

    meekmode Starter

    2,133
    784
    219
    :crazy:
     
    • High Five High Five x 1
    • Hit the Target Hit the Target x 1
  5. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE goTitans 2019 Survivor Champion

    82,274
    26,649
    1,509
    I loved the addition of Jones, said he'd be our real MVP because his presence allows everyone to have time to do their job. Schwenke was a doormat at Center
     
    • Cheers Cheers x 1
  6. CalgaryTitansFan

    CalgaryTitansFan Pro Bowler

    4,901
    1,873
    689
    So having a shiny new RB being hit behind the LOS because the OL can't open holes from him would have been better? You do know that Cowboys have one of the best OLs in the NFL, right? An OL that has 3 1st rounders on it, one or two being top ten.

    If you think we should have stayed at #1 (would have had to where Elliott was picked) to take a RB, and not get Conklin, the #5 overall this year and an extra third, then you're straight up trolling or a moron. Maybe both.
     
    • High Five High Five x 2
    • Unreadable Unreadable x 1
  7. 615nick

    615nick Starter

    2,350
    923
    469
    Because Elliott was so much more productive than a Murray/henry combo.

    Elliot- 1631yds...15tds
    Murray- 1287...9
    Henry- 490..5
    Combined- 1777..14

    That's rushing alone, ill leave receiving stats alone. We got henry, murray and conklin for the price of Elliott. I'm pretty sure we made a good choice.
     
    • Hit the Target Hit the Target x 2
    • High Five High Five x 1
  8. Titan Wrath

    Titan Wrath Starter

    159
    39
    134
    yeah I'll still take Zeke and Henry over Conklin, Murray and Henry
     
    • WTF?! WTF?! x 2
    • LOL LOL x 1
    • Unreadable Unreadable x 1
  9. meekmode

    meekmode Starter

    2,133
    784
    219
    draft zeke, not take all the free draft picks and then draft another RB in the 2nd, Genius moves!!
     
    • High Five High Five x 2
    • LOL LOL x 1
  10. TitansWrath

    TitansWrath Pro Bowler

    5,313
    3,054
    779
    So you would take Zeke (Thus giving up a #5 overall this year, plus other picks) and THEN turn around and take another RB in the second.

    Wow. Even the browns aren't that retarded.

    You do realize, that with the trade last year, we could (if we were retarded) take cook or fortenette this year to pair with henry?

    Not that it would matter, as Cassell would have been starting at some point and your awesome RB's would be getting buttraped in the backfield all game.
     
    • High Five High Five x 1
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  • Welcome to goTitans.com

    Established in 2000, goTitans.com is the place for Tennessee Titans fans to talk Titans. Our roots go back to the Tennessee Oilers Fan Page in 1997 and we currently have 4,000 diehard members with 1.5 million messages. To find out about advertising opportunities, contact TitanJeff.
  • The Tip Jar

    For those of you interested in helping the cause, we offer The Tip Jar. For $2 a month, you can become a subscriber and enjoy goTitans.com without ads.

    Hit the Tip Jar