Stafford to the Rams, Goff to the Lions

The original question was worded weird, I think it was in Australian.

I think he's saying that Watson fetches more than Stafford, aka 3 firsts.

 

The original question was worded weird, I think it was in Australian.

I think he's saying that Watson fetches more than Stafford, aka 3 firsts.

 

And play for a Super Bowl and have a very good roster. The defense is so good if they had any kind of offense they would be a SB contender. So it has worked out pretty well.

 

I think it sets a baseline of no less than 2 firsts to get him. They need players too, so it may well be a blend of picks and players like this deal.

 

As stated before, in 2 years the lions are out of the Goff contract with no dead money. First round picks in 2022 and 2023 and this years 3rd round pick is crazy. For a 33 year old qb that has back issues and lets be honest has issues with turnovers ( how many pick 6's has he thrown in his career? 23 7th all time in NFL history!)

This means the Rams will have not had a first round pick in 7 straight years. And it all started with Jeff Fisher trading with us to get Goff in 2016!

 

Reminds me of the Redskins back when Bobby Beathard was GM.

 

Remember who he played with....the worst NFL franchise, and still managed to have a very good career. Rams are a real SB contender now.

 

I think that baseline had already been set.

 

no I’m saying that the Rams would’ve offered more to get Watson if they felt he was worth more. They chose Stanford because they values him at the deal more than they or (presumably) other interested teams would. In short, Rams picking Stanford and not Watson could be considered Watsons market value.