Redskins have 3 sacks already.

I'm not watching the game in DC full time, watching the red zone, but the one play I did see I thought Haynesworth got the sack. So I was suprised to see he didn't get one yet.

 

It's the Chiefs, I could get a sack against them.

 

Why can't you understand sarcasm?

 

A better question is why IS the Chiefs' O-Line playing in the NFL?

 

remember holmes and that kansas city line - they once had the best line in the game with the best running game.

my how things change fast....just as the mullet

 

Probably because not all 32 teams have Olines like Kansas City.

... and the Redskins lost. Albert must have been wreaking havoc all game!

 

Through 6 games:

Redskins D has dropped in overall defense, and gives up more yards on the ground. (Critics?)

Titans D... well we just suck now. For whatever reason though, we're better at stopping the run. (Critics?) So I think the people on the line benefit from Haynesworth more than anyone else, which probably what caused those sacks. Maybe his pressure made the secondary Pro Bowlers, or maybe it was Schwartz.

But frankly, I can't see any effect Haynesworth is making from a statistical vantage. Both teams are terrible and we'll be atop the draft in April, overpaying for an unproven player.

 

Albert just jumped from one sinking ship to another. Thing is where as we will get good again the Redskins wont. All they do is spend money and don't spend it wisely.