Official 'Rep Your pick with Highlights' thread

Hmmmm....

A lot of his highlights are as a rb and as a pr...not as a wr. Where's bigt arguing we don't need a rb at wr???

Gut

 

hey, in the third round i wouldn't hate the williams pick, even though he never really produced, but we need more than a guy with no position in the first.

 

I wouldn't mind having Nicks.

And it would have been nice to have a playmaking WR cough (RB) cough this year to fill in for Johnson when he got hurt in the Ravens game.

Derrick Williams will be a play maker in the NFL.

 

Well...

Sometimes guys like that end up being really good players...my friend said the same thing about Justin Tuck. However, there is a lot more risk involved.

Gut

 

Johnson's lack of motor is certainly a concern, but if we are going to take a "project", I absolutely want them to be an O-Linemen or D-Linemen.

Munchak and Washburn are as good as any line coaches in the league and if we are going to take a guy with the physical skills to mould into a great player, I'd be more comfortable taking a Defensive linemen than a receiver, for instance.

I said it elsewhere. Johnson is almost the prototype Washburn D-Linemen. Long arms, great athleticism and explosion. He is not at a position of need because I liked what I say out of the two young guys last season, but he is certainly intriguing as a prospect.

 

Well...

It's not JUST his lack of motor...but is inability to dominate. In a 9minute highlight reel, you can find maybe 4 plays where he's dominant. That's NOT good!

And I don't wanna take projects in rnd 1. In rnd 4...no problem! I'd rather draft a Sidbury in rnd 3-4 than Michael Johnson in rnd 1!

Gut