Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Movies/TV' started by Puck, Jul 21, 2007.
It was... just wrong. Didn't work.
Is it way worse than the first Jurassic World? I know a lot of people **** on that one too but I thought it was a pretty fun, albeit dumb, popcorn movie.
I enjoy the first one. Fallen Kingdom was just... off.
I hated the first one.
The second one made the first look like Citizen Kane. It was very cringey. The jokes were bad. The thrills were cheap and not very thrilling. It felt very cheap and heartless. The ****ing dinosaur smiled when it tricked someone.
The worst joke was when the “creatacious vet”(if that’s even a thing) is a very feminist looking woman and one of the antagonists gets into an argument with her. He says to himself, “what a nasty woman.” Sound familiar from a 2016 presidential election?
The new dinosaur was supposed to be the ultimate predator. It took like ten minutes of screen time to kill it. Conversely, the indominus Rex took an entire movie to kill.
The editing felt weird in spots too.
The way it ended, the third will be even worse.
The Lost World was no masterpiece in it's own right, but it did a much better job of setting the themes about conservationism and environmentalism.
It was very cool seeing the fruition of the original park after so many years. The story was fine. It was fine.
No one should go into any Jurassic film and expect it to capture the excitement and awe of the first one. The Jurassic World films are ok for what they are, fun (though a bit ridiculous) popcorn movies. They aren’t going to make anyone’s “best” lists but they are still action movies with dinosaurs. I’ll still be watching the 3rd installment
No, it’s most definitely a Disney film. Saw it on Friday. It was fine. A lot of nods to the original. The pacing was really weird though. Like, you were expecting a character to say something and they just stood there silently.
A Dumbo without the racist crows is a Dumbo not worth watching. That was Disney's first mistake.