Bulluck vs. KVB

I want to see how KVB does without Hanesworth.

 

bulluck doesnt care about the money.

 

Every player cares about the money, otherwise they wouldn't be making 1-20 million dollars a year after their first payday.

 

I was hoping this was a thread about who is stronger.

 

There should be no other place to play, than Nashville, for Bulluck.

 

Wow, there's an instant credibility drop...

Man, do you also think that he goes home and rides a unicorn in the offseason, and that he's so good because he uses pixie dust?

 

you have to keep mr. monday night!

 

Sorry can't choose, Keep both...or when we win the Super Bowl this season maybe they could just retire a TITAN!

 

How many dlinemen do we have sitting on the bench that can contribute? Compared to our LB's, like McGrath/Keglar, I'd feel better having Bulluck with our Dline rotation rather than kvb minus a bulluck.

 

I say KVB, because I think we could realistically sign him at a reasonable price. KVB came into this town as the broken bust from Arizona that nobody cared about to being a respected defensive end - he said it himself, if it wasn't for Tennessee, he wouldn't be having the success he is (please don't make me find that quote, because I'm a lazy lazy man :ha.

K-Bull has been my favourite player on this defence for a long, long time - a leader in all regards and a man you'd be proud to have on your D. Thing is though, he's getting old and he's going to want to win. I'm not saying we're not a Superbowl contender, because of course we are, but there are teams out there who are expected in the Bowl on a yearly basis. That's why teams keep signing on with the Patriots; they're proven winners and they have a system that works.

Keith Bulluck's contributions are massive, but he might just be too expensive, considering his age. ...Anyone know of any good LB's coming out of the draft next year?