Tannehill contract 2023

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by Rwill, Jan 10, 2023.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Mitch86

    Mitch86 Pro Bowler

    5,874
    2,064
    759
    They get 2 "post June 1st" designations per year. If they cut a player pre June first, all signing bonuses are due then. If the designate for post June 1st, it's spread over that year and the next year's cap. So you actually cut the player before June but get the cap savings.
     
  2. 8Bruce8

    8Bruce8 Starter

    1,482
    339
    309
    Ah OK. Thanks for clearing that up.
     
    • Cheers Cheers x 1
  3. Rwill

    Rwill Pro Bowler

    3,909
    1,185
    729
    I dont know if it is possible but if it were I would try something like dropping 10mil from this season and adding it to next season, so we end up with 14mil next season and 26mil this season. We are 8mil over the cap I do believe, as we sit right now.
     
  4. Carp

    Carp Starter

    2,985
    718
    439
    Unless it's changed, you can designate 2 players as post June 1 cuts, but cut them in March.
     
    • Cheers Cheers x 1
  5. Tricky

    Tricky Starter

    3,431
    1,139
    469
    2 options

    1. Cut him with post-June 1 designation
    $9.6m dead cap, $27m total cap savings

    2. Restructure to clear space and keep him around another year or two

    Can’t keep him on the roster with his contract as-is. This will depend on if the new GM/OC want to keep him around and if he’s willing to restructure. I’d guess he takes the restructure. Just hope it’s team friendly.
    I still have faith that Tannehill can get it done if he’s got the support around him with OC/OL/WR and health. None of which he had this year.
     
    • Cheers Cheers x 3
    • High Five High Five x 1
  6. Mitch86

    Mitch86 Pro Bowler

    5,874
    2,064
    759
    I don't see any other option unless they are willing to tank the season of they think there is some hidden gem available in the draft. Any other vet is going to be around the same money as Tannehill, I'd think.

    If a new GM comes in and even thinks of starting Malik Willis, they should be fired immediately. Hell, I'd kind of question em if they even keep Willis on the roster to be honest.
     
    • High Five High Five x 1
  7. GoT

    GoT Strength and Honor

    69,352
    19,805
    1,659
    zero risk in putting mw7 on PS ... nobody gonna claim him cause they would have to put him on their 53 for what... a month? rest of season? something like that. Only a stupid GM would put a team in such a clearly noncompetitive position... just sayin'
     
  8. Hormesis

    Hormesis Pro Bowler

    7,108
    1,864
    779
    That’s the answer!
     
    • Cheers Cheers x 1
  9. Hormesis

    Hormesis Pro Bowler

    7,108
    1,864
    779
    Dra
    Try to find his replacement next year in the draft at all cost once this line is revamped.
     
    • Cheers Cheers x 1
  10. Hormesis

    Hormesis Pro Bowler

    7,108
    1,864
    779
    Agree, it makes the most since to try and keep him with a team friendly deal. Pretty sure that’s what’s going to happen.
     
    • Cheers Cheers x 1
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  • Welcome to goTitans.com

    Established in 2000, goTitans.com is the place for Tennessee Titans fans to talk Titans. Our roots go back to the Tennessee Oilers Fan Page in 1997 and we currently have 4,000 diehard members with 1.5 million messages. To find out about advertising opportunities, contact TitanJeff.
  • The Tip Jar

    For those of you interested in helping the cause, we offer The Tip Jar. For $2 a month, you can become a subscriber and enjoy goTitans.com without ads.

    Hit the Tip Jar