Pro Bowl

Per ESPN, Simmons has 3 sacks and 1 run stuff. No way anybody who isn't a Titans/Miss State fan is picking him over dudes like Buckner and Chris Jones.

For him to get Pro Bowls in the future, we need to be dominant as a team unit and probably have someone get big sack numbers (so Simmons gets more credit as a disruptor).

 

If Tannehill played for NE he would be in lol

 

If Tannehill played for NE they would be in the play-off hunt.

 

And they would be talking about him even more

 

"Robbed" is a bit strong.

Mahomes and Josh Allen were locks. Watson has just as much of a case to be made as Tannehill.

It's not a participation trophy. Not everyone gets selected.

 

So true....

Mike Herndon

@MikeMiracles
·
18h

Ryan Tannehill is leading the highest scoring offense in the league and ranks top 5 in TDs, YPA, passer rating, QBR, *deep breath*, 4th qtr comebacks, game winning drives, DYAR, CPOE, DVOA. He’s also avoiding sacks and interceptions at an elite rate. If that ain’t a Pro Bowler...

 

And then you look at Watson's stats and realize he has more yards, a higher completion %, a higher YPA, a higher passer rating, and the same number of game-winning drives with a much worse supporting cast.

They're both deserving, but there are only three spots. "Robbed" is an overstatement.

 

One is doing so on a "Run Heavy" Offensive team the other one is doing so on a "Pass Oriented" Offensive team.
I'm just ecstatic that my guy is producing at this level ...

 

So are you saying Tannehill over Watson?

Just to be clear both are deserving.

 

If we're saying they're pretty even in terms of production, I would argue the tie should go to the QB who has twice as many wins.

Also, garbage time stats don't impress me. Putting up the numbers Tannehill has and leading your team to wins is more impressive IMO.