WR and MLB at 10 & 39

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by JCBRAVE, Mar 25, 2013.

  1. The Playmaker

    The Playmaker pineapple pizza party

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    12,857
    I would be down for this if we trade back. Using mock drafts Ogletree isn't close to being a top 10 pick and there really isn't a WR worthy of a top 10 pick. If we could fall back a few spots and pick up a 3rd then go Ogletree and Patton/Hunter/Hopkins that would be great. Then we can go OG and DE/CB/FS after that.
    #61
  2. Scarecrow

    Scarecrow CEO of PPO

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Messages:
    21,033
    You are entitled to your opinion, but I swear to god you didn't read a word either one of us said.

    And in no way shape or form does Ogletree not unseat McCarthy for the starting spot.

    He likely won't be there when we trade back. Cincy, Pitt, Baltimore, and a few other teams have needs at MLB. Plus, while he lately hasn't been in the top 10, he was before free agency began. I find those to be the most accurate as far as play talent goes.
    #62
  3. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,402
    ...and we wouldn't have Zach Brown.

    edit: nevermind, I assume your talking about instead of KW.
    #63
  4. Ewker

    Ewker Starter

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2002
    Messages:
    4,340

    your crazy..the Titans still need to go OL in the 1st round...Wr's and the Titans never work out
    #64
  5. Two Kings

    Two Kings NJ Titan

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Messages:
    2,216
    Still say we go Guard. I feel that we are transitioning to an old Dinger offense that was played with George and McNair.

    With a focus on the run getting better we'll need a stout oline. After that, well that is up in the air.

    MLB is def important as is WR, but the prospects right now don't make sense and we are focusing on a slot guy. I would say we take Austin in the first and maybe a guard in the second.

    or warmack at 10 and a slot guy in the 2nd. DE S and DT are still needs imo as well.

    Next year I think we look to replace Britt, McCarthy, and CJ2K
    #65
  6. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,402
    1st: Warmack or Cooper, OG
    2nd: Tank Carradine, DE, FSU
    3rd: Fallen WR (Hunter, Patton, Dobson, Rogers, Woods, or Swope)
    3rdC: Terry Hawtorne, CB, Illinois
    4th: AJ Klein, ILB, Iowa St

    Cut Amano & Hawkins, sign Quentin Jammer
    #66
  7. UrbanLegend3

    UrbanLegend3 Starter

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2012
    Messages:
    4,357
    I guess I kinda see where the logic for MLB and WR comes from but there is one major hint that it won't happen. The fact that the FO decided to go after and sign guys like Fokou and Jones pretty much tells you they are only after McCarthy insurance. They believe in him and are banking on the fact that he will be healthy. If they wanted a starting LB they would have pursued one. I honestly believe we got OG, DE, or CB in the first. Anything else would shock me. Yes the Kendall pick was a shocker last year but in retrospect it shouldn't have been. Our receiving corps were in shambles, it's just that we took the wrong kind of WR imo, the pick should have been Alshon. Our WR's aren't amazing but as a group they are solid no way we take one in the first, second maybe, by the 3rd definitely.
    #67
  8. Anders

    Anders Special Teams Standout

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2013
    Messages:
    12
  9. DaFunkYMonkeY

    DaFunkYMonkeY Practice Squad

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2013
    Messages:
    64
    I actually have to agree with JCB the website is wrong we actually pick before the jets not after them in the second round
    #69
  10. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,402
    So every site is wrong on the internet, i've yet to find one w/ us @ #39... even though we should be #39. What gives NFL!
    #70