1. Pardon our mess as we continue to update the new forum software. Big thanks to Mike and Preditan for all their help in the transition. If you run into any problems, put them in the Update Thread.

Who would be better?

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by Xplayer52, Mar 10, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RyansTitans

    RyansTitans Guest

    If Ginn is there at 19.. were getting him. No doubt about it.
    #21
  2. we arent going to draft him dude
    #22
  3. RyansTitans

    RyansTitans Guest

    Brandon.. Roby .. Orr.. uh.. Givens?

    Yeah were drafting a reciever..
    #23
  4. Fry

    Fry Hatin' is what I do.

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2004
    Messages:
    25,408
    im all for drafting WRs, not track stars.
    #24
  5. if so, its not going to be ginn, were gonna want someone that is a sure pick
    #25
  6. Architect

    Architect Pain Train

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    893
    Patrick Willis!
    #26
  7. no need... we have tulloch, he did the best out of everyone on the defense during the preseason last year, and did really well when he got playing time this year
    #27
  8. Gunny

    Gunny Lord and Master Tip Jar Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2002
    Messages:
    46,319
    except Reggie Bush can catch.


    (and he had 88 catches last season)
    #28
  9. LazyManJackson

    LazyManJackson Starter

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Messages:
    2,986
    don't forgot we use a lot of nickel packages, with 2 OLB's, so its not as if he's gonna be on the field as much as other MLB's around the league...
    #29
  10. GLinks

    GLinks Titans on the Rise

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    5,213
    I can see us drafting any of those 3 WRs, with Meachem being the most rounded of the three. Bowe is the one who mentally I think is ready to come in and play, though. Wish he had just a little more speed. I'll be looking forward to his pro day, but I suppose there's a chance he'll just stand on his combine time.
    #30
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.