Who is our best weapon on offense?

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by Scarecrow, Oct 21, 2013.

?

Biggest weapon on offense

  1. Chris Johnson

    17.2%
  2. Jake Locker

    45.3%
  3. Kendall Wright

    34.4%
  4. Nate Washington

    3.1%
  5. Other, please state

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,400
    problem with Chris is he runs like a god damn girl
    #61
    • High Five High Five x 2
  2. damersbrah

    damersbrah Special Teams Standout

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2010
    Messages:
    267
    Well 30 runs a game is an exaggeration, but the guy still is our most explosive player at a skill position. Say what you want about the guy, but no one else on our offense commands the type of defensive attention and game-planning like CJ. Has his play regressed? Yes. Does he need to step his game up? Yes. But he is still the best we have, and we need to do a better job of setting him up for success and putting him in position to make use of his talents (better blocking, more screens/short passes, better run design/timing).

    Who else on our team is a threat to take the ball 50+ yards to the house when they get in open field?
    #62
    • High Five High Five x 2
  3. The Hammer

    The Hammer Straight Ridah

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2012
    Messages:
    15,706


    *Was

    Locker is now
    #63
    • High Five High Five x 2
  4. TitansWillWin2

    TitansWillWin2 Starter

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    5,823

    THEN GET HIM IN SPACE!!! Dont run stupid curl routes with him. Look how other teams like the lions and saints get their weapons in space!
    #64
  5. TitansWillWin2

    TitansWillWin2 Starter

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    5,823

    Now that you can argue b/c he is a qb.
    #65
    • High Five High Five x 1
  6. SlidePiece

    SlidePiece Starter

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    1,330
    I just saw the highlights of Chris Ivory running for the Jets this past Sunday, and it's not even close. There's a gap in the effort level between the two that's a mile wide.
    #66
    • High Five High Five x 1
  7. UrbanLegend3

    UrbanLegend3 Starter

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2012
    Messages:
    4,209
    I love Kendall, don't get me wrong but assume it's a play where the player has the ball in the open field, who do you want CJ or Kendall? We've seen them both in space this year and while Kendall has been good it's really no comparison in my book. Kendall is great but CJ is deadly. Thing about Kendall though is he can catch TD's whereas CJ is having a tough time running them in. But really CJ looked MUCH better running the ball this week. He was hitting runs up the middle cause Schwenke was actually creating room for him and Jake. I think we'll see that dominating running attack come back after the bye.
    #67
    • High Five High Five x 1
  8. dtm586

    dtm586 Starter

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,277
    Voted Wright although its probably Locker. Wright has been catching everything and seems to be the only consistent WR on this team (although Washington has been somewhat consistent) but Wright will be the playmaker on this team for years. QB is an easy choice to pick on most teams so ill go with Wright.
    #68
    • High Five High Five x 1
  9. titan_fan_4ever

    titan_fan_4ever Titans Rule

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2006
    Messages:
    2,545
    I voted Lock b/c he was listed, I'd probably take that back though.

    QBs are considered the 'Generals' and therefore aren't really weapons - in this analogy, WRs/TEs/RBs are the weapons.

    I'd vote Nate, after yet again proving he is consistently there for the QB and can also make big plays when given the chance.
    #69
    • High Five High Five x 1
  10. Dman

    Dman Starter

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2013
    Messages:
    4,411


    I could agree with that but I also think Wright will become our main weapon. I think he is now but it is fair to throw nate in after what he has done for us in the recent past.
    #70