Which would you prefer?

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by 2ToneBlueBlood, Apr 19, 2011.

?

Which scenario do you like better?

  1. Scenario #1 (QB in the 1st, DT in the 2nd)

    7 vote(s)
    36.8%
  2. Scenario #2 (DT in the 1st, QB in the 2nd)

    12 vote(s)
    63.2%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 2ToneBlueBlood

    2ToneBlueBlood On Twitter @2ToneBlueBlood

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Messages:
    1,885
    I've been going back and forth trying to decide which of the following scenarios would be the best direction to go in the draft.

    Scenario #1:

    - Even though Fairley is available at 8, we pick a QB, and have our choice of one of the following: Gabbert, Newton, Locker, Mallett.
    - At 39 we have our choice of some of the second tier DT's: Paea, Austin, Liuget

    *This scenario means that none of the QB's listed that are available at 8 are available at 39.

    Scenario #2:

    - At 8, we go with Fairley and wait to draft a QB until round 2
    - Pick 39 we can choose beteween the second tier QB's: Ponder, Dalton, Stanzi, Kaepernick

    The basic question is, out of the players that will more than likely be available, which scenario do you like better and why?
    #1
  2. Titanic_Sub

    Titanic_Sub Starter

    Joined:
    May 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,467
    Fairley and Ponder.
    #2
    • High Five High Five x 1
  3. The Playmaker

    The Playmaker pineapple pizza party

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    12,957
    Option 3: We trade down, get some more picks, take a QB we can get at #8 later then stock up on defense.

    But I rather take the QB we want in the 1st then take a DT/DE in the 2nd since that's the poll question.
    #3
    • High Five High Five x 1
  4. TorontoTitanFan

    TorontoTitanFan Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2006
    Messages:
    5,297
    I don't think it's safe to assume that Ponder, Dalton or Kaepernick will be available in round 2.
    #4
  5. Alex1939

    Alex1939 Old Man Tip Jar Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    16,207
    I'm ok with no QBs in the 2011 draft.

    There will eventually be free agency this year. There will be a draft in 2012. There will be free agency in 2012.

    Maybe we are better getting the QB from one of those avenues instead of this year's draft.
    #5
    • High Five High Five x 2
  6. Fry

    Fry Hatin' is what I do.

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2004
    Messages:
    26,208
    Scenario one. If you told me we would have the pick of the little from the QBs in the draft at 8 I don't think there is any choice to but to take him.

    I also hate the listing of the second tier QBs. Dalton is the only one I think could amount to anything...
    #6
  7. TheSureThing

    TheSureThing WHY DIDNT YOU DRAFT JOHNNY FOOTBALL?!?

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Messages:
    7,385
    option 4:

    Keep Vince Young, the QB that won 30 games for us even with Fisher as his coach. Ride with a proven winner. Draft Fairley, and not have to worry about drafting a QB the rest of the draft.
    #7
    • High Five High Five x 1
  8. OhioTitan

    OhioTitan GO BUCKS!!!!!!!!!

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    381
    Senario 1, but only if we are sold on one of the qb's.

    More than likely he wont be there in the second and trying to trade back into the first is still risky and would probably cost to much. With the depth at DT this year, i think the better value would be to guarentee we get our QB and still pick up solid help at DT in the second.
    #8
  9. Tennessy XO

    Tennessy XO @TennessyXO

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    13,718
    That isn't an option because the organization doesn't want him.
    Hypothetical trade down for Ponder or Locker is more realistic.
    #9
  10. TheSureThing

    TheSureThing WHY DIDNT YOU DRAFT JOHNNY FOOTBALL?!?

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Messages:
    7,385
    When was this established???

    I'm pretty sure Bud Adams still "wants" him..
    #10
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.