Velasco/Matthews/Harris

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by Broken Record, Jan 7, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE Tweet me @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    45,329
    My opinion of Velasco, Matthews, and Harris are this:

    Velasco is very versatile. Has played all 3 interior offensive line positions. And because of that, I value him more as solid depth that I do as a potential starter. He's also a bit weak. Maybe in another year or two he can step up and be a full-time starter, but even in college the guy took a couple of season to get himself right.

    Matthews is a rookie, or was. Now he's shown he has some potential. I like his family tree, but that's as much as I know.

    Harris we all know can play inside, but he's struggles when the man beside him sucks. Get Amano out of here, and we have something in Harris.
    #11
  2. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE Tweet me @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    45,329
    See McNabb
    #12
  3. munie

    munie Starter

    Joined:
    May 18, 2007
    Messages:
    99
    I really like Velasco. The run game seemed to be a lot more solid. Matthews showed some potential as a rookie but IMO harris needs to be benched along with Amano. Personally I think the Titans are one solid move from having a solid offensive line. Put Velasco at G or C and find a stud G/C in the offseason and it'll do wonders next year. Titans need to stop this wait and see approach with harris and amano because they DON'T have it. Velasco can be very solid but we also need a regulator in the middle.
    #13
  4. HeadOnASwivel

    HeadOnASwivel Starter

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,555
    Velasco is pretty good at holding, but other than that he's a very average guard. I haven't seen enough of Matthews to make an accurate call on him. Harris is probably the best of the bunch, but he needs to be moved back to center.

    Move Harris back to center and sign Logan Mankins... problem solved.
    #14
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.