Two things heard on NFL Total Access...

he refused to admitt the raiders are a bad team. he was obviously biased. he said the o-line was not the problem, but aaron brooks held on to the ball too long.

 

Rod Woodson has no idea what he is talking about most of the time.

 

To clarify, it was on "Four Downs," and his two choices were Tennessee or Oakland. Once a Faider, always a Faider.

 

I like Woodson. He sure was a nasty player. Made watching the Squeelers fun (sorry, I was a NYG fan back when I was young). But you guys are right, he doesn't seem to due much homework now that he's in "broadcasting".
On a related note, the NFLN guys almost never say anything of substance do they? I like watching the channel, but sometimes it's SO vanilla.

 

i dont think they're allowed to say what they're really thinking. it's all pretty much propaganda.

 

We get no national TV coverage unless we are a play off contender. How many of these so called analysts actually know whats going on with the Titans?

Other than the odd hour they spend before the show reading their colleagues headlines & predictions they art clueless. In this day & age with the internet being as it is ,the loyal fan knows far more about what is right & wrong with a team than the analysts.:sad2:

 

True. You can almost tell who reads who doesn't. And they all should, it would make their job easier anyway. There are a few who can analyze without reading a bbs, but they are usually former coaches.