Titans will "discuss" Randy Moss

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by TitanJeff, Nov 1, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TitansBlue

    TitansBlue Camp Fodder

    1,101
    68
    0
    you think he complained earlier? Just wait until he ends up 2nd or 3rd WR on a depth chart

    that said if Moss were a TE I would totally understand it given the Clark situation, but they're not going to try to make that up with another WR, especially with how well manning is already doing. That and they're a team that both 1) isn't going to want to have to pay that portion of Moss's contract they would have to on waivers and 2) they're a franchise that's pretty prioritized in avoiding getting players that may cause problems or issues amongst the team, especially ones that have already shown such.


    I think the idea sits so certainly with you just because you don't like the team since they're in the same division and the idea that the Titans would have to play the Colts + Randy Moss might unnerve/scare a bit. But, realistically, it's just as likely as the idea that he ends up on a team like a situation with Ochocinco and Owens in Cincinnatti.
     
  2. TitansBlue

    TitansBlue Camp Fodder

    1,101
    68
    0
    that and a defensive coordinator would have to consider whether he wants that extra guy still on Johnson or covering Moss
     
  3. CKTitan

    CKTitan Special Teams Standout

    287
    32
    54
    :pop: I would love to see that as comic relief.
     
  4. joeman546

    joeman546 Rookie

    331
    53
    44
    #wouldnttouchmosswithatenfootpole

    #lazyplayerswhogetteammateshurt
     
  5. Eddyc85

    Eddyc85 Go Bucks!

    4,932
    712
    0
    Yea we'll discuss him, discuss why we shouldn't get him.

    Sure it makes tons and tons of sense. Our best receiver is injured not to mention Gage to (Hawkins doesn't scare anyone), we're on a bye week so gives him time to learn the team, and he's super cheap. But no we wont get him. Why would we? There's too many reasons TO sign him that of course we wont. Commitment to mediocrity!
     
  6. CKTitan

    CKTitan Special Teams Standout

    287
    32
    54
    IDK dude prior to yesterday Fisher has soften his stance on his philosophy after Denver humiliated us at home; if it means clearing up the gut for CJ and forcing a double-team to benefit Washington, Williams, Scaife, and Cook I don't see what harm it would do.
     
  7. Eddyc85

    Eddyc85 Go Bucks!

    4,932
    712
    0
    Bringing in Moss wouldn't do any harm. What team is better without having Randy Moss on it? No he's not perfect but nobody is but with what he can do and missing Britt it just makes too much sense to not bring him in. But bringing in a player with any kind of name recognition whatsoever is not our style. We prefer to play it low key, that's how you get to be so consistently mediocre like we are.
     
  8. Titanic_Sub

    Titanic_Sub Pro Bowler

    7,092
    1,739
    679
    The Vikings weren't....
     
  9. Eddyc85

    Eddyc85 Go Bucks!

    4,932
    712
    0
    You sure about that?

    Without Moss: 14.3 points per game.

    With Moss: 21.5 points per game.

    Lets go one stop further.

    Patriots without: 28.7 PPG

    Patriots with: 30 PPG

    Numbers don't lie.
     
  10. Titanic_Sub

    Titanic_Sub Pro Bowler

    7,092
    1,739
    679
    So they are going to cut a player that is making them better? lol k.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  • Welcome to goTitans.com

    Established in 2000, goTitans.com is the place for Tennessee Titans fans to talk Titans. Our roots go back to the Tennessee Oilers Fan Page in 1997 and we currently have 4,000 diehard members with 1.5 million messages. To find out about advertising opportunities, contact TitanJeff.
  • The Tip Jar

    For those of you interested in helping the cause, we offer The Tip Jar. For $2 a month, you can become a subscriber and enjoy goTitans.com without ads.

    Hit the Tip Jar