Titans "strongly" considering Locker at 8

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by TheSureThing, Apr 22, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ScotTitan

    ScotTitan Special Teams Standout

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2010
    Messages:
    846
    You only joined last month.

    I selected Jake Locker at 8 in our mock draft nearly 2 months ago and got abuse for it.. Do I get a cookie? Not that anyhting has been decided yet.

    I still say we should trade down to 10-25 and take a shot at Locker or Mallett. If we cant we need a QB and will take one at 8
    #31
  2. Deuce Wayne

    Deuce Wayne Damnit, I cant find my driving moccasins anywhere!

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Messages:
    28,243
    Don't claim you called it until you actually hear his name on draft day.

    I doubt he goes in the top 20.
    #32
    • High Five High Five x 3
  3. RavensShallBurn

    RavensShallBurn Ruck the Favens

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2009
    Messages:
    20,351
    We can get Andrew Luck next year. Guarantee it.

    No point in doing this.
    #33
  4. dtm586

    dtm586 Starter

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,335
    everyone was against a QB this early as soon as the season ended and as soon as Luck decided to stay - now no one was high on any of the QB's including myself making a thread about grabbing a playmaker in the 1st round and waiting on QB in the 2nd round ... but forget all that - i am jumping aboard the "hype train" with Locker as well ... scoot over make some room im jumping aboard the bandwagon ... TITANS PLEASE DRAFT JAKE LOCKER ... "LOCK" IT UP ...

    and p.s. my signature proves i am hoping the titans lock up locker
    #34
  5. dtm586

    dtm586 Starter

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,335
    oh and the #10 jersey is officially available just in time for Locker (says Munchak) ;)
    #35
  6. RavensShallBurn

    RavensShallBurn Ruck the Favens

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2009
    Messages:
    20,351
    He's too inaccurate... not a good pocket passer.
    #36
    • High Five High Five x 1
  7. HeadOnASwivel

    HeadOnASwivel Starter

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,556
    Lord, I really hope we don't take Locker in the first round. Right when I want to hope this orginzagion has turend a page with player evaluation they may take Locker; an inaccurate QB who is uncomfrotable throwing in the pocket. Haven't we just gone through this over the last five years... inaccurate passer who is not comortable in the pocker? I'm praying that we see the light and pull a short term fix with a vetran free agent and try to fix the QB position long term next draft.
    #37
  8. tenforthewin

    tenforthewin Camp Fodder

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2009
    Messages:
    389
    Next year's QB class isn't going to be any better than this years, in fact, it's probably worse. And the Titans won't have the first pick next year, this team will win some games this year. So don't bank on that.
    #38
  9. Soxcat

    Soxcat Starter

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    8,485
    If we take a QB at #8 the only guy I think I'd consider besides Gabbert is Mallett. Otherwise I'm about settled the real value is in the 2nd round for a QB. I'd rather wait or possibly trade up a few spots into the 1st from the 2nd to get a QB but truly, taking Locker at #8 is ridiculous. I'm not sure I like the guy at #39.
    #39
    • High Five High Five x 3
  10. Spartacus

    Spartacus Camp Fodder

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    Messages:
    19
    I hope the FO doesn't follow your example next Thursday...:D
    #40
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.