Players get compared to the 'greats' all of the time, by fans, players and experts. But that should not be interpretted as the one saying it thinks they will have the same or better career. The reason we choose 'greats' to compare players too is because everyone knows who they are. I'm sure there is a much more apt comparison out there that very few people would have heard of. But if no one has heard of that person, then what is the point of the comparison. I don't think anyone thinks Hunter will have a HoF career like Moss (would be nice though lol). But, you can still share a lot similar traits to them. They can have similar physical attributes, and even similar playing styles but not have the same type of production over their careers. Anyone that thinks Preston is saying "hunter is the next Moss" is interpretting that wrong. I don't think any poster on here feels that way either. Doesn't mean you can't compare them though.