Titans and Collins Agree in Principle to Terms

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by GoTitans3801, Aug 28, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. rayzor2004

    rayzor2004 Guest

    Horrible decision

    Why or why are you spending money on another quarterback Reese??? QB's are the least of our problems, how bout some depth at WR and O line?????:gag:
    #41
  2. rcarie

    rcarie Tac Head

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,797
    We're pretty deep and WR. If anything, we need Oline help.
    #42
  3. 4andershv

    4andershv Camp Fodder

    Joined:
    May 28, 2006
    Messages:
    192
    Maybe the FO had faith in the Volek/Young duo but lost it during the hideous preseason games, or

    Maybe the price just wasn't right until now

    So what your'e saying is basically: If we can't make the playoffs, I don't care if we are 7-9 or 1-15?

    If thats the case I strongly disagree with you!
    #43
  4. Puck

    Puck Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    13,051
    look at the bright side........

    we can cut Mauck now
    :yes:
    #44
  5. Raydawg

    Raydawg Titans Rock !!!!

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2002
    Messages:
    45
    No way Collins is brought in to be the #2 or #3. Collins is being brought in to be the starter. I know he doesn't know the playbook but he is going to be this teams QB.

    Volek has looked horrible. I understand the OLine is bad but he has been flat out horrible.

    Collins will do better than Volek.

    Could Volek be released? He has no trade value anymore. What are the cap ramifications?

    We are going no place this year so why does it matter.

    VY will NOT be inactive for any game this season. We have already heard the talk of a package for him for a series or two each half.

    VY will be the QB next season and 2008 will be our year to begin our next move to the top of the standings.

    Welcome Kerry Collins!!!!
    #45
  6. Puck

    Puck Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    13,051
    why's that ?
    i don't remember that being an official rule

    what if you're #1 gets a temporary injury or dehydrates
    then you're #2 comes in and gets knocked out from a concussion
    so the #3 comes in and is inneffective
    let's assume this is pre-half

    so, after the half, you're #1 is rehydrated ....... (or whatever)
    why then couldn't you re-install your starter ?
    #46
  7. Slackmaster

    Slackmaster Starter

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    Messages:
    1,234
    This is the dumbest FO move I have seen in years.

    It really dampens my enthusiasm for the whole team.

    KC sucks, and any team stupid enough to sign him will also suck.

    Oh well, maybe next year.
    #47
  8. Slackmaster

    Slackmaster Starter

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    Messages:
    1,234
    The "official rule" part only is valid if your #3 QB is among your inactive players for the game.
    If your #3 is listed inactive, but plays because the others go down, you can't just use him as relief.
    #48
  9. Soxcat

    Soxcat Starter

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    8,487
    I still don't get this "Volek looks like crap" mentality. Volek has played in what amounts to just over one games worth of snaps and is 24-38 for 266 yards. Thats 63% completions. Volek had a 17 yarder to Wade and a 36 yarder to Troupe taken away because of holds by Pillar in Sat game. Volek also had that picture perfect pass to Bennett that Bennett couldn't hang on to in the first game. That was another 40+ yards he got screwed out of.

    The fact we can't run the ball doesn't exactly help our offense sustain drives either.
    #49
  10. Canadian Titan

    Canadian Titan VY & CJ = New SM & EG

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    180
    Yay to the signing of Collins :ha:

    I liked him in Carolina when he started his career, he's a big QB with strong arm. He can take hits too like the cheap shot he took from Romo years ago.

    Also, he's better than Volek!
    #50
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.