Welcome to goTitans.com! Log in or sign up to be a part of the best Tennessee Titans fan site available.

The Ball Carrier Down By Contact Rule

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by ColtKiller, Oct 12, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Watchers:
This thread is being watched by 3 users.
  1. ColtKiller Starter

    Brown
    Messages:
    3,531
    Moolah:
    $4,018
    Needs to be changed.

    There needs to be a clause stating that downing a ball carrier must clearly be an intentional act and not the result of incidental contact. 2 hand touch, if you will, would be perfect. Both hands on the downed ball carrier to clearly constitute a 'tackle'. IE Michael Griffin fumble recovery a couple games back, when a linemans shin 'downed' him, negating the TD run after he got up. IE Kenny Britt's should be TD catch Sunday. The CB barely touched him as he was catching the ball falling forward. Just my opinion. Accidental or incidental things like those two examples (especially the first) shouldn't be counted as downing the ball carrier.
    #1
    2 people high five this.
  2. Deuce Wayne Damnit, I cant find my driving moccasins anywhere!

    Martin
    Messages:
    26,641
    Moolah:
    $13,314
    Please. The NFL cant even figure out what a catch is and now you want them to figure out what a tackle is? LEAVE THE NFL ALONE!!! :)
    1 people high five this.
  3. Vigsted Starter

    Messages:
    4,220
    Moolah:
    $1,367
    Jenkins' contact was clearly intentional and how on earth do you propose the officials should be able to tell if contact was intentional or not?
  4. PhiSlammaJamma Yao

    C. Johnson
    Messages:
    6,500
    Moolah:
    $21
    One thing is at what point does the touch no longer count? Two steps, three steps, or when? what if he is touched, takes three steps, then falls down? What is it then?
  5. Ewker Starter

    Stevens
    Messages:
    4,303
    Moolah:
    $1,864
    I wonder if you would feel this way if it was against the Titans and the other team scored or are you just being a :bighomer:
  6. SEC 330 BIPOLAR jive turkey

    Verner
    Messages:
    16,099
    Moolah:
    $327
    a rule change would only muddy the waters.
  7. JCBRAVE Welcome to my world, now sit down and listen up

    Casey
    Messages:
    38,566
    Moolah:
    $209,279
    I like the idea of needing to be touched by two hands in these instances. It is "tackle" football for crying out loud. Make the defender accountable for being the reason the play ends. Don't let them luck out by brushing the receivers with a pinky.
  8. Titanup1982 Pro Bowler

    Washington
    Messages:
    10,470
    Moolah:
    $22,230
    Lol, i thought the same thing :ha:
    1 people high five this.
  9. SEC 330 BIPOLAR jive turkey

    Verner
    Messages:
    16,099
    Moolah:
    $327
    a rule change over this would generate so many blown calls and needless reviews. it's WAAAAY too subjective and far too common. It's kind of cool that you can get up at all and advance the ball. What's next? One foot in bounds should be a catch?
  10. TorontoTitanFan Pro Bowler

    Brown
    Messages:
    5,057
    Moolah:
    $6,350
    The last thing the NFL needs is more long reviews. Asking referees to decide whether a touch was intention would never work.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page