The Ball Carrier Down By Contact Rule

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by ColtKiller, Oct 12, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ColtKiller

    ColtKiller Starter

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,556
    Needs to be changed.

    There needs to be a clause stating that downing a ball carrier must clearly be an intentional act and not the result of incidental contact. 2 hand touch, if you will, would be perfect. Both hands on the downed ball carrier to clearly constitute a 'tackle'. IE Michael Griffin fumble recovery a couple games back, when a linemans shin 'downed' him, negating the TD run after he got up. IE Kenny Britt's should be TD catch Sunday. The CB barely touched him as he was catching the ball falling forward. Just my opinion. Accidental or incidental things like those two examples (especially the first) shouldn't be counted as downing the ball carrier.
    #1
    • High Five High Five x 2
  2. Deuce Wayne

    Deuce Wayne Damnit, I cant find my driving moccasins anywhere!

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Messages:
    28,248
    Please. The NFL cant even figure out what a catch is and now you want them to figure out what a tackle is? LEAVE THE NFL ALONE!!! :)
    #2
    • High Five High Five x 1
  3. Vigsted

    Vigsted Starter

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2005
    Messages:
    4,341
    Jenkins' contact was clearly intentional and how on earth do you propose the officials should be able to tell if contact was intentional or not?
    #3
  4. PhiSlammaJamma

    PhiSlammaJamma Critical Possession

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2003
    Messages:
    6,518
    One thing is at what point does the touch no longer count? Two steps, three steps, or when? what if he is touched, takes three steps, then falls down? What is it then?
    #4
  5. Ewker

    Ewker Starter

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2002
    Messages:
    4,356
    I wonder if you would feel this way if it was against the Titans and the other team scored or are you just being a :bighomer:
    #5
  6. SEC 330 BIPOLAR

    SEC 330 BIPOLAR jive turkey

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    16,087
    a rule change would only muddy the waters.
    #6
  7. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE Tweet me @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    46,050
    I like the idea of needing to be touched by two hands in these instances. It is "tackle" football for crying out loud. Make the defender accountable for being the reason the play ends. Don't let them luck out by brushing the receivers with a pinky.
    #7
  8. Titanup1982

    Titanup1982 Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    11,365
    Lol, i thought the same thing :ha:
    #8
    • High Five High Five x 1
  9. SEC 330 BIPOLAR

    SEC 330 BIPOLAR jive turkey

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    16,087
    a rule change over this would generate so many blown calls and needless reviews. it's WAAAAY too subjective and far too common. It's kind of cool that you can get up at all and advance the ball. What's next? One foot in bounds should be a catch?
    #9
  10. TorontoTitanFan

    TorontoTitanFan Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2006
    Messages:
    5,395
    The last thing the NFL needs is more long reviews. Asking referees to decide whether a touch was intention would never work.
    #10
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.