I kind of agree with Denver and New York, why can't they host the Super Bowl? As far as I'm concerned, snow, cold weather and football go together. Are they thinking that noone would show up? Are they thinking that the sponsers won't pay 2.4 million for a commercial shot? Fair is fair. If the stadium is large enough and the city has everything in place that it needs to meet the NFL guidelines, why not? The only difference is snow vs. sunblock. Personally, I would go to a Super Bowl game if it was in Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Cleveland, where ever.