Some early mock draft picks

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by Titans Insider, Jan 15, 2014.

  1. JR1980

    JR1980 Starter

    Joined:
    May 10, 2013
    Messages:
    1,622
    Truth is, #11 is a weird spot, because studs will fall, the question is who, and what do the Titans do?! Go for need or BPA, or trade back.......
    #41
  2. Renfro95

    Renfro95 Starter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2013
    Messages:
    532
    If I am goin a tackle, I trade back if I have someone willing to give me a 3 or better. If a defensive playmaker or someone is there who you dont pass up there (Watkins maybe) then I go get my guy. Not saying Watkins is there, but if for whatever reason, he falls, you probably have the opp to trade down, but can you pass up that playmaker?
    #42
    • High Five High Five x 1
  3. JR1980

    JR1980 Starter

    Joined:
    May 10, 2013
    Messages:
    1,622
    That would be a REALLY tough decision for them.....Watkins, Wright, Hunter, Washington?????!!! Filthy...but I can't lie, I'd be pissed with so many other needs, and Locker trying to chuck him the ball
    #43
  4. Ensconatus

    Ensconatus Losing faith...

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    9,900
    If Watkins is there you tried to trade the spot
    #44
    • High Five High Five x 1
  5. Renfro95

    Renfro95 Starter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2013
    Messages:
    532
    I think you would have several takers in that scenario. A Watkins can come in and help right away offensively and in the return game. I could see someone throwin a ridiculous trade offer out there to move up and snag him. I would be inclined to trade too, but I would be gritting my teeth in the process.
    #45
  6. JR1980

    JR1980 Starter

    Joined:
    May 10, 2013
    Messages:
    1,622
    I won't lie, even though the Titans have spent a lot at receiver, they could probably use Watkins. I figure Watkins and Hunter on the outside, and let Wright carve defenses in the slot...That being said, with all of the needs they have, they would be STUPID not to trade that pick and reap the benefits. I pray that this happens, or that a stud falls to #11
    #46
  7. JR1980

    JR1980 Starter

    Joined:
    May 10, 2013
    Messages:
    1,622
    Tell you what though, I do NOT want a tackle at #11....They need to get that a bit later, especially with the amount of tackles available.
    #47
  8. Renfro95

    Renfro95 Starter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2013
    Messages:
    532
    I appreciate linemen more than most and didnt have ANY issue with taking Warmack last draft. That being said, I am not completely sold that Stingly cant produce at right tackle. I also belive you can shore that up in free agency or go grab a Tiny Richardson down the road and move him to RT. Theres too many options, IMO, to go tackle at 11 this season. Want that defensive playmaker more than anything.
    #48
    • High Five High Five x 1
  9. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,532
    :hang: People said we wouldn't draft a guard last year either... then look what happened. Hopefully we stay away from OL in the 1st this year.
    #49
    • High Five High Five x 1
  10. JR1980

    JR1980 Starter

    Joined:
    May 10, 2013
    Messages:
    1,622
    I agree, I value linemen, and I think Warmack will be fine in due time...However, they really need to get a playmaker and have bigger needs up front. I think they should get a defensive playmaker in the 1st and then look for OT/RB/QB/ afterwards on Offense personally. I just hope that they don't reach, and I would REALLY love to see them get a 3rd round pick back. That hurts big time....
    #50