Should I trade R Moss for Forte?

Discussion in 'Titan Cup/Fantasy Football' started by ammotroop, Oct 6, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ammotroop

    ammotroop Airforce MAN

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,507
    It is a PPR leage...and FORTE is killin it with the receptions. Should I give up R Moss for him? Thanks!
    #1
  2. SawdustMan

    SawdustMan Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    11,421
    I wouldn't do it unless I was just super stacked at WR and RB needy. Who are your other RBs and WRs?
    #2
  3. ammotroop

    ammotroop Airforce MAN

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,507
    WR

    B Floyd
    S Holmes
    B Tate
    Manningham

    RB
    S Jackson
    CJ Spiller
    J Charles
    Darby

    We start 2 RB and 2 WR --- and one flex --- TE/WR/RB

    14 Team League
    #3
  4. Tuckfro42

    Tuckfro42 Frozen Donkey Wheel

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,885
    Don't do it. You're pretty weak at WR as is and Moss is going to get a lot of looks from Favre.
    #4
  5. SawdustMan

    SawdustMan Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    11,421
    I think it's a coin flip situation. Forte would definitely boost your RB group but like tuck said, Moss is going to get a ton of looks in Minnesota. If it were me, I probably wouldn't pull the trigger on this one. But I don't think it's necessarily a bad trade or anything.
    #5
  6. Soxcat

    Soxcat Starter

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    8,485
    No way I'd make that trade. Forte has some significant yards receiving but 150 of his 200 yards came in one game (including 2 of his 3 TDs). The Bears are pitiful run blocking so I don't see him getting much running the ball going forward either.

    On the other hand Moss is more valuable now than he was with NE. He is going to be the go to guy where in NE they had other guys getting the passes. Favre is going to be going his way very often and I expect Moss to be very motivated. On top of that your WRs are weaker than your RBs.
    #6
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.