Refs "try" to screw Ravens again.

TITANS AVOIDED A SAFETY, GOT EXTRA DOWN Posted by Mike Florio on January 12, 2009, 9:08 a.m.
Lost in the aftermath of Saturday's Ravens-Titans game are two mistakes -- one questionable, one obvious -- that fueled a second-quarter Tennessee drive, and that possibly saved the Titans from a safety.

(Several readers have pointed this issue out to us over the past couple of days, but we didn't have time to study the issue properly until this morning, and we didn't want to go off half-****ed . . . like we usually do.)

Facing second and nine from their own two, the Titans' first stroke of luck came after Terrell Suggs of the Ravens blasted through the line and hit running back Chris Johnson in the end zone.

Via the official PFT TiVo service (we could put those ads in a rotation with the Lucky Charms banner), it appears that the ball was not completely out of the end zone at the moment Johnson's knee hit the ground.



But the CBS announcing crew never even mentioned the possibility that the play should have been ruled a safety, and Ravens coach John Harbaugh didn't challenge it.

The Titans converted a first down on that drive, thanks to Ahmard Hall's catch and run that was capped with a viscious hit from Ray Lewis.

On the next drive, a first-down run from Chris Johnson ended in a penalty against the Titans. And referee Terry McAulay was clear: "After the play, personal foul, unnecessary roughness, offense number 76. Forearm to the head. Half the distance to the goal. Second down. The down counts."

The only problem? On the next play, the down marker still showed a "1?.

On "first" down, Johnson gained nine yards, giving the Titans "second" (i.e., third) down and three. On "second" (i.e., third) down, LenDale White was bottled up for no gain. Then on "third" (i.e., fourth) down, quarterback Kerry Collins found Justin Gage for a first down.

As Dan Dierdorf of CBS said after the play, "If this drive results in no points whatsoever, it is already an outstanding drive for Tennessee."

It was not an outstanding drive for Dierdorf or Greg Gumbel, who missed not only the potential safety but also the extra down that the Titans received.

The drive ultimately ended in an interception inside the Ravens' 10. But the drive should have ended just as it was starting with two points to Baltimore and a free kick, or a punt from deep in the Titans' own end of the field.

The fact that the Ravens won the game makes the errors less consequential, but errors indeed they were.

And, at a minimum, the mistakes help to balance out the perception that the Ravens were handed the game via the failure of the officials to call a delay of game penalty that would have wiped out a key gain during the game-winning drive.

I guess when Flacco stepped out of bounds in the endzone that was more luck by the Titans they did not get a call.

Seemed more the refs were on there knees for the raven in that one.

Neither team got a safety now drop it. Why make this thread? Go lose to the Steelers again, honestly. You complain after a win, that's amazing to me.

THIS is why you don't listen to FLORIO:

LEAGUE SAYS TITANS DIDN’T GET AN EXTRA PLAY
Posted by Mike Florio on January 12, 2009, 10:42 a.m.

As it turns out, we won’t have to resort to the TiVo machine to find out whether the Titans received an extra down during a key field-position-altering drive in the second quarter of Saturday’s playoff game against Baltimore. (But we still will, if for no reason other than to satisfy our curiosity. And to avoid doing actual work.)

NFL spokesman Greg Aiello tells us that referee Terry McAulay did indeed correct his on-air statement that the first-down play would count, but that the clarification could be barely heard in the background of the CBS announcing crew and was not thereafter mentioned by Greg Gumbel or Dan Dierdorf.

(We’re still a bit confused as to why the unnecessary rougness penalty was enforced from the so-called “succeeding spot” if the down didn’t count, and we’ll research the rule book a bit more closely on that point when we have time and/or insomnia. Our initial thought is that, if the down didn’t count, the half-the-distance penalty should have been enforced from the prior spot, which was the Tennessee 12. The penalty was instead enforced from the 19.)

As to the non-safety safety call from a few players earlier, Aiello said only this: “Baltimore did not challenge.”

And, possibly, all that that implies.

Mike Florio is an east coast lawyer in his home state of West Virginia and quite obviously a closet gay-ray lover