Pacman Sued by Vegas Bouncer...

The idea is, if he said Pac bit him, and DNA says he didnt, that show hes lying, now we have to wonder what else hes lying about

 

Here is an interesting tidbit: Streptococcus predominate on the teeth of almost all humans. Streptococci are genotypically diverse and isolates cultured from bite marks may be matched exclusively to those from the teeth of the biter. This may provide valuable evidence in forensic investigations when human DNA cannot be recovered.

 

Here is something even stranger from Baylor School of Medicine: Their is a DNA protocol for fruit flies called PACMAN and the headline says thay PACMAN takes a bite out of deciphering fly DNA.
http://www.bcm.edu/fromthelab/vol06/is1/0207-2.html

 

Lt..

Maybe someone else bit him and he thought it was pacman. Maybe it was pacman's girlfirend sadia morrison who has also been charged and named in this suit.

You are also aware that 2 other people were shot? And neither of them accused anyone of biting them. What about tom urbanski the other bouncer who is now paralyzed? I guess the lack of pacman dna proved that he to is a liar?

 

Riverman's logic...

The victims of the crime deserve "compensation" but are frivolous if they try and get compensation from pacman.

http://www.answers.com/topic/frivolous?cat=biz-fin


A guy with gunshot wounds is just being silly and inappropriate.

What does riverman really think? He thinks shooting victims seeking restitution is fine in principle just not in this case because pacman is a titan and a good player..

 

Not even close short-bus. Try again.

 

that was good. :ha:

 

:ha:

 

ewww, did someone just get burned in here or something?