I'll make this my last post on the subject because I'm only repeating myself at this point. The entire point of this thread is to point out, again, that Schwartz isn't the only reason for the performance of the Titans defense and that execution plays the biggest role. So many of you think a change at DC is all that is needed and that is totally flawed logic, IMO. You (Schwartz bashers) blame him when the defense blows tackles yet he gets nothing when they are tackling well. Funny, how that scheme improves when the front four can get a pass rush or the Titans don't whiff on tackles. You only point out the gashing by Westbrook in the second half yet totally ignore the Titans D only gave up 20 yards to him the entire first half in their normal D and he only got his yards when the team was in the nickel preventing the big play with a two touchdown lead. You say the game at Indy was a fluke or that Schwartz was just copying another team's scheme (like every DC in the league doesn't). And those of you who refuse to give the man credit for when he led a successful Ds in '02 and '03 are just attempting to rewrite history. For those of you who want Schwartz fired, you need to be redirecting your attention to Fisher who hired the man, keeps the man on the payroll, and signs off on the scheme you are so critical of each week. For those of you who blame Schwartz for poor player development or shoddy technique, you need to look to fire everyone down to the position coaches who are paid to develop these players and teach technique. But I suppose it is easier to blame Schwartz to those who don't care to deal in reality.