Munchak over /under

I think it is less about wins, and more about how we lost.

Close games with some controversial calls? As long as we make it a minimum 8-8. I think that is the absolute BARE MINIMUM that Munch sticks next year. However, with some of the recent comments from Bud, I am starting to think it is playoffs or bust and I support that. I don't see Munch as a Super Bowl winning coach and would honestly prefer we move to a guy that could get us one ASAP.

 

The day before the first game and we already have our first Jon Gruden post. I'll never understand the people of Tennessee's obsession with the guy.

 

If we open the season 0-4 yea lets talk new coaches, but no Jon Gruden, and no Herm lol.

 

I think he must win at least 9.

 

Honestly I'm not even sure 8-8 is enough. I tend to think a VERY competitive 9-7 is what it will take. I don't think Bud spent > $100 million this offseason for 8-8. IMO we need to be at least playing for a playoff spot come week 17.

 

Any game against PIT, BAL, NE, and EVERY division rival is a must win. Throw in the fact its the start of a new season and HC wants to save his job – course its a must win, are you kidding? We saw this team’s officials preaching in the offseason that ‘low standards’ are out the window. And its time to put up or shut up.

Do you guys remember, you know back in our dominant days, how much it stung to lose…. Lately that seems to have become the norm around here. In fact I need us to start 3-0 – PIT, HOU, SD – two teams from the list I put above and the last seemingly our kyrptonight for as long as I remember… I need 3-0 on our way to at least 10-6 and a playoff birth or ill be calling for some heads to roll.... or like i said above shut up...

--

With that I obviously voted 8+, but I had to comment and say even that is too generous. He went 9-7 his first year here, with Palmer and Gray and less talent, so with that in mind, he better do better than 9 wins...