Munch on 102.5 this morning...

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by Titans2004, Mar 25, 2013.

  1. Titans2004

    Titans2004 Starter

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2004
    Messages:
    2,419
    I didn't catch all of the interview, but one thing that Munch said was that we are still looking to improve the OL. Also said that we would still like to improve the talent around Locker. I can only guess this means the WR position.

    He said that they have been to Alabama and worked out their guys on an individual basis. Said it is the individual workouts at the schools that are 2nd in importance behind their actual on field production in evaluating a player. He said that Matthews has been to see a bunch of OL.

    Mentioned that the addition of our FAs shoulod help bring a new attitude to the team.

    Anyone else catch the full interview?
    #1
  2. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,397
    Sounds good to me. OL, WR, DE, CB with our first four picks in BPA order.
    #2
  3. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,796
    Munchak said "Jake knows it is his team now. No one looking over his shoulder. He sets the tone, he sets the meetings, it's his."

    I didn't know players set meetings.
    #3
  4. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,796
    I also liked how Munchak basically said Bud Adams f*cked us last year LOL
    #4
    • High Five High Five x 1
  5. Two Kings

    Two Kings NJ Titan

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Messages:
    2,174
    no S or DT?

    I wouldn't mind a true slot WR or a true burner on the outside. I look at what we got in Verner and McCourtney and even Finny and what rounds they were taken. I really really don't think we need to take a CB in the first three rounds. Maybe our 2nd 3rd round pick.

    I would still like a true run stopping DT or every down (Haynesworth esc) DT. That would just improve the secondary so much.
    #5
    • High Five High Five x 2
  6. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,397
    We have a solid DT rotation with Casey, Hill, Martin, Pitoitua, and Klug. I wouldn't mind a DT if one falls (Star or Floyd), but would rather go DE, WR, CB in the 2nd/3rd if there's also a DT available.

    I think we're good at safety with Griff, Martin, Pollard, and Wilson.

    I want Terry Hawthorne with our 3rd comp pick out of Illinois. It would be nice to go pickup one of the available vet CBs for a small 1 or 2 year vet min deal.
    #6
  7. Two Kings

    Two Kings NJ Titan

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Messages:
    2,174
    Its a weird spot. I guess we have to look at the future as well. What position has questions marks after this year and I would say S, DE, and WR.
    #7
  8. The Playmaker

    The Playmaker pineapple pizza party

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    12,810
    Right now we only have 2 good CB's (statistically at least) and not really anyone that sticks out after that, or at least someone we would trust to get a lot more playing time. Also, Verner's contract ends after this year and we need some leverage against him and some insurance in case he does leave. We definitely need to go CB within the first 3 rounds.
    #8
    • High Five High Five x 1
  9. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,397
    Nailed it. We gotta pickup another CB, although I do like Coty Sensabaugh. I really want to find a true #2 [potentially #1] CB to pair w. McCourty. I'd love is Trufant was available with our 2nd, don't see it happening however.
    #9
  10. The Playmaker

    The Playmaker pineapple pizza party

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    12,810
    Yeah unfortunately I don't either. Even though blogger's mocks aren't the most accurate I've seen him going as high as 10 and as low as the late 20's. Maybe if a few of those teams are a bit more down on him then we might have a chance.
    #10