Mike Munchak Approval Poll

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by SawdustMan, Oct 30, 2012.

?

Munch: Approve or Disapprove?

  1. Approve

    18.0%
  2. Disapprove

    82.0%
  1. Riverman

    Riverman That may be....

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    Messages:
    8,789
    Yeah- as in we've blown a lead.
    #41
  2. TitansWillWin2

    TitansWillWin2 Starter

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    6,394
    The fact that he is babying Locker in order to save his own arse makes me dislike him big time. He is nothing more than Fisher 2.0
    #42
  3. titantrusince82

    titantrusince82 I'm down with the Titans for better or worse

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    3,486
    If Munch could bring in Mike Nolan as DC, he would have my support. However, I feel that the worst decision he has made was hiring Grey as his DC. For that reason alone, I have to vote NO because I hate Grey's existence. He needs to get the F!!! out of Nashville!
    #43
  4. World Peace

    World Peace n/a

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    6,548
    4 people voted yes?
    #44
  5. pettso

    pettso Starter

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,454
    If you had made this poll last week (before the Colts game), the results would be vastly different. Titans' fans on this board are on tilt.

    Thinking about it rationally though, he's done pretty much exactly what I expected him to do. We've been an average team going through a rebuild process with a new, mechanically unsound QB. He's had a lot go wrong:
    1) He got hired on as coach after all good coordinators were gone. He got his pick of the leftovers and he's stuck with them so far. Both Gray and Palmer are awful and don't have the respect of their players.
    2) Britt injury destroyed last season.
    3) CJ2K + OLine have vastly underperformed. This could be linked to the Palmer issue above.
    4) Locker injury.

    Big mistakes he's made:
    1) Letting Finnegan walk.
    2) Very questionable motivation for a few games where we got blown out.
    3) Loss to a winless Colts team when playoffs were on the line.

    Where he's made the team better:
    ??

    Overall, he's been average. I don't think he's been completely awful, but I am not satisfied.
    #45
  6. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,513
    I'm ehhhh right now. I think if he had a better DC, we'd be in a waaay better situation right now and this debate wouldn't be happening.
    #46
    • High Five High Five x 2
  7. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,513
    Not sure how much of that is his fault vs Ruston/Reinfeldt
    #47
    • High Five High Five x 1
  8. Big Time Titan

    Big Time Titan Big Time Titan

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    5,901
    I am one of those 4, I proudly support Munchak.
    #48
  9. SawdustMan

    SawdustMan Pro Bowler Tip Jar Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    12,445
    He hand picked his DC.
    #49
  10. pettso

    pettso Starter

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,454
    It's possible, but I'm pretty sure Munchak had a say in the decision. If Munchak had gone to whoever the GM was at the time and said Finnegan is an integral part of the defense and would be a big loss, they would have paid him. Instead, they paid McCourty almost as much and we're sitting at $16M under the cap. Sweet.
    #50