Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by Titans Insider, Oct 15, 2013.
That's what I thought The Hammer
You are basing whether a player is better or not because of their injury history. Yet, one player is NOT suppose to be hit and the other is suppose tackle RBs and TEs.
Read the conversation between me and the hammer before assuming something stupid. I'm not bashing either player. He simply said that, "McCarthy should be replaced because he is injury prone" and I said to that, "so you're saying Locker should be replaced as well?"
I didn't assume anything stupid. You asked "Is Locker better than McCarthy?" to which you then proceeded to make an outrageous comparison in their injury history to base it off of.
I never asked you anything so Idk where you are getting this from! lol My entire debate was with the hammer. Pay attention man.
OK, you asked Hammer that question and I responded to your question with a statement of my own. I apologize if the recent posts were too confusing for you to follow.
To confusing? No. Out of context? YES. I never asked the question if Locker is better than McCarthy. I was debating the fact is McCarthy more injury prone than Locker. This is what happens when you assume things! You make an ass out of u and me.
Yea exactly. You questioned if McCarthy who tackles large people running at top speeds at them was more injury prone than someone who is not suppose to take a hit. You actually compared Locker's injury history against McCarthy's to sway a discussion that, in your opinion, Locker is as injury prone or more than McCarthy. To which I find fascinating on many levels.
He is as injury prone as McCarthy being that he has missed almost the same amount of games due to injury since 2012
Pimp-C gonna make a pick-6 this weekend, can't wait. He nearly had one last week.
Separate names with a comma.