Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Video Games' started by TitanJeff, Jun 2, 2008.
Who is Vickerson? It's interesting Fowler and Tulloch have same rating.
They weren't good enough to secure their spot by beating the Bengals so why did they deserve it?
It's not like they were screwed out of it, they simply couldn't do it.
And why should we have lost to the Colts?
because our starters were lucky enough to squeeze one out in the 4th quarter vs 3rd stringers. I'm guessing the Browns would have easily won that one had they've been the ones lucky enough to play the colts in week 16.
By the way. That Bengals team they just couldn't beat, absolutely destroyed us.
We won they lost.
When determining who's better, it's not that simple. Unless we're just being complete homers. As...we (you guys here) too often are.
We got lucky. They didn't. We needed teams to lose to get in. All they needed was to win.
Actually, they needed us to lose to get in. So that theory is gone.
This is just the first build.. Many different sites have different rosters.. for example Sports Gamer has LenDale White as an 82 OVR while this site which is PastaPadre that TitanJeff posted has him at 84.
IGN will post the final ratings soon
As a matter of fact I just found this
The BS and you know it. The colts game shouldn't have been a decider and we should have already been in the playoffs. If the refs wouldn't have handed the game to san diego(on that 4 and 20 SD catch which was proved to be incomplete by the local news channel) the titans would've been 10-5. Plus the browns had one of the weakest schedules in the league. Get off the ESPN bandwagon.
True. But our Defense collapsed just as much as the refs helped. It's really not a big deal. I think the Browns were better than us last year. They were actually playing like a playoff team heading in to week 16. We weren't. We were collapsing.
But at the same time, I'm pretty sure the Browns' entire season was a fluke.
I think the Browns are back to 4/5 wins next year.