I don't think it's a negative at all. I just think you have to take that into consideration if you're going to use the logic of "Well, anyone who is top 3 all-time at any given stat deserves to be in the Hall". I agree he was an iron man. That's my whole point. I think his longevity is causing him to be overrated a bit in this conversation. Here are his 5 best seasons statistically: - 2000: 5.5 Sacks, 2 INT, 1 FF, 2 DEF TD - 2001: 1 Sack, 10 INT, 1 FF, 1 DEF TD - 2004: 3 Sacks, 2 INT, 2 FF, 2 DEF TD - 2005: 2 Sacks, 5 INT, 0 FF, 0 DEF TD - 2008: 2 Sacks, 4 INT, 0 FF, 1 DEF TD Be honest, if you didn't know who I was talking about and I showed you those stats would you think this player was HoF bound?