I Am Starting Vince Young

Discussion in 'Titan Cup/Fantasy Football' started by Abe Froman, Dec 9, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Abe Froman

    Abe Froman Sausage King of Chicago

    I am going to hop on the Vince Young bandwagon and ride him all the way through the playoffs.

    Can't believe I am saying this, but Vince Young will be my starter for the rest of the year.

    I am in 2nd place and need to take over the #1 spot.

    For the record: I have Jay Cutler and Eli Manning on the bench. Vince is surprisingly the best choice IMO. Cutler is a huge disappointment.

    Thoughts? Anyone else pick him up in their league?

    JCBRAVE Wake up and die right Tip Jar Donor

    First off, you have too many QB's. I keep two not three, but that's just me in my league. I also have Vince on one of my two teams. He's starting ahead of McNabb for me and is showing up in fantasy points.

    If I were you Abe Froman, I would ditch Cutler and pick up a RB or a WR on a team fighting for January in real football. But if your in second place then you know whats up, so go get em with Vince.
  3. TheSureThing

    TheSureThing Straight Cash Homie

    I started VY weeks ago, undefeated since putting him in. Over matt schaub of all QB's. And I believe he's out performed Schaub 3/5 weeks.
  4. BudAdams

    BudAdams SayHelloToMyLittleFriends

    I am starting Drew Brees.
  5. Abe Froman

    Abe Froman Sausage King of Chicago

    I usually wouldn't keep three QBs, but my lineup is pretty solid otherwise. No free agents I really want to pick up at the moment.

    Here's my team as long as we are talking fantasy (10-man league):

    QB - VY
    WR - R. Moss
    WR - S. Rice
    WR - S. Smith
    RB - A. Peterson
    RB - R. Mendenhall
    TE - V. Davis
    K - R. Bironas
    DEF - Green Bay

    BN - Cincinatti
    BN - E. Manning
    BN - J. Cutler
    BN - J. Forsett
    BN - A. Gates

    Just in case you were wondering: no one drafted Vernon Davis. I picked him up in like week 2.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.