Hypothetical Trade: #10 for #23 & #25?

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by xpmar9x, Mar 23, 2013.

#10 for #23 & #25 - Yes or No?

  1. Yes

    14 vote(s)
    100.0%
  2. No

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    13,877
    4,657
    609
    Vikings own #23 and #25, lets say they're interest in player unknown at #10.. the two who stand out are Tavon Austin & Xavier Rhodes. Vikings could use Austin to replace Percy, Austin is flying up the boards and Vikings don't have any receivers besides Jennings (who isn't young by any means). Vikings also don't have any CBs that are noteworthy, perhaps Rhodes stands out for them and they move up for him.

    My question is, Vikings call and offer #23 & #25 for our #10 - do you accept?
    According to most draft trade charts, we'd be getting better value. So, we may need to throw in our 4th, which wouldn't bother me.

    I would do this deal, depending who's on the board. I could very well see Star, Ansah, Milliner, and Warmack all off the board. We'd have so many options with #23, #25, and #40. We could go something like Desmond Trufant (#23), Tank Carradine (#25), & Larry Warford (#40).

    What do you all think?
    #1
    • High Five High Five x 1
  2. griff33daddy

    griff33daddy Special Teams Standout

    1,286
    142
    79
    we turn around and trade our 3rd and 23 to move up and get vacarro, cooper and okafor
    #2
  3. steverife

    steverife Starter

    3,341
    1,171
    369
    There are a lot of players that I really like, but I don't like at the 10 spot. I would absolutely make that trade.
    #3
  4. Titan43

    Titan43 Pro Bowler

    4,126
    2,075
    519
    Of course I trade 1 1st rd pick for 2 1st rd picks ... there is some magically allure surrounding top draft picks, like a high pick will be a superstar. That's just not true. Most high picks don't pan out either (at least not in the franchise changing way people seem to expect).

    Its really a roll of the dice in the draft, whether you pick at #1 or 32. The higher draft picks are only worth more because you have more options to choose from, not because the talent us really that much better.

    So having 2 picks increases your chances of hitting it big. So I'd take the 2.
    #4
  5. RavensShallBurn

    RavensShallBurn Ruck the Favens

    22,784
    9,493
    939
    If Milliner slips to us somehow, the Vikings might go for that trade.

    I still don't see any team giving up that much though. But yes, I'd take that trade in a heartbeat.
    #5
  6. running bull

    running bull Practice Squad

    42
    1
    24
    I would luv this trade,we have signed 2 gs & ziggy could bust at 10,
    23, D Trufant cb 1 of the top 3 cbs,could be the best.plus atv fa next year
    25. T Eifert te best te in draft & we need a weapon at te, for locker.
    #6
  7. The Playmaker

    The Playmaker pineapple pizza party

    14,063
    2,598
    579
    If Milliner falls to us, would the Titans still pull the trigger? Or even Ansah?

    Also I wouldn't be surprised if Cooper or Warmack fell to us, remember DeCastro last year and all of his pre draft hype?
    #7
  8. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    13,877
    4,657
    609
    I could see them moving up for X as well. It's unlikely Rhodes will get past #11 SD (lost Jammer and Cason), #12 Dolphins (lost Sean Smith), #13 Bucs (no CBs).
    #8
  9. HeadOnASwivel

    HeadOnASwivel Starter

    2,734
    848
    269
    That such a no-brainer, YES!!!
    #9
  10. Titanup1982

    Titanup1982 Pro Bowler

    11,924
    4,019
    809
    I would do that trade in a heartbeat.
    #10