Houston+Turner or Revis+Dillon?

Neither Houston nor Revis is going to make it to the 19th pick, and Houston definetely is not going to make into the mid twenties. Cornerback is a premiere marquee position, and there is usually a run on them in the middle of the first round.

 

i guess we might go WR, but if we get him we need to go defense

 

Do what? Both will be there at 19. Mid twenties, at least one will be there.

 

I think the same thing. Two of Houston, Hall and Revis should be around at 19.

 

houston or none as far as CBs go in the first

 

Turner and Hooch :ha:
couldn't resist

I've always been a little more warm towards Houston since I think Revis may already be gone. We have all got to keep in mind that Turner is a 6-8 year option for us and Dillon would be a 2 year option at best

 

Signing Dillon (or Brown for that matter) would signal that we'll be relying on LenDale for the long term, I think everyone knows that, and I'd like to see us at least give him a shot, I still think he was the better back at USC, he seems to me to be the type of guy that you can hand the ball to and know you're getting 3-4 yards.

 

I'm for us signing Dillon, but I wouldn't mind Turner. He's go experience, and he will be around longer than Dillon. So if LenDale doesn't pan out then we have Turner and could even trade White if we needed to.

 

If we sign Turner we will never know what LenDale could do, in a Titan's uni at least. That's the main reason I'd almost rather us get Dillon, because LenDale could be our back of the future if we let him.