Welcome to goTitans.com! Log in or sign up to be a part of the best Tennessee Titans fan site available.

Gone Baby Gone

Discussion in 'Movies & TV' started by Deuce Wayne, Feb 7, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Watchers:
This thread is being watched by 2 users.
  1. Deuce Wayne They're ILLUSIONS, Michael!

    Martin
    Messages:
    24,048
    Moolah:
    $7,355
    Somehow went under the radar this year. Much better than a lot of movies that have received major hype, IMO.

    http://beta.rottentomatoes.com/m/gone_baby_gone/

    93% on rottentomatoes, but yet I haven't heard much about it. Enjoyed it though. Affleck may need to stick with directing.
    #1
  2. GoTitans3801 Forward Progress!

    Messages:
    7,640
    Moolah:
    $0
    Wow. Remember last week when you were saying how rotten tomatoes was a terrible basis for judging movies?

    This is why I bicker with you so much. No consistency, no real point, just throwing things out there without logic or real opinion.
    • Tip Jar Donor

    Childress79 Loungefly ®

    Messages:
    7,688
    Moolah:
    $5

    It had a delayed & messed up release because it was due out just as the Madeline McCann abduction story broke. Afleck asked the studio to put it on ice out of respect for the McCanns situation. By the time it came out the cast weren't available to promote it.

    What did you think at the end,without giving anything away,did he make the right decision?

    I would have gone the other way without question. I've seen too many alcoholics & junkies to see it any other way.
  3. Ubiq BAMF

    Messages:
    1,636
    Moolah:
    $0
    One of the best movies made in a long while.

    I agree with you Childress, I would have gone the other way as well. It's obvious where the real happiness would have been.
  4. Deuce Wayne They're ILLUSIONS, Michael!

    Martin
    Messages:
    24,048
    Moolah:
    $7,355
    I would have went the other way as well.

    and lol @ BigTitan. Dude, I'm using RT to show people liked a movie that some may not have ever heard of. I am not however trying to prove it's a good movie (as you were) with RT ratings.
    Nice try though. Following logic within an argument might help you, and might help me in the process.
  5. ammotroop Airforce MAN

    Messages:
    3,507
    Moolah:
    $25
    I liked the movie. I would have went the other way to.
  6. Fry I need Slurm!

    McCarthy
    Messages:
    20,982
    Moolah:
    $6,183
    this is bigtitan's first post on this thread, but thanks for thinking about me....
  7. Deuce Wayne They're ILLUSIONS, Michael!

    Martin
    Messages:
    24,048
    Moolah:
    $7,355
    Mai bad. Just saw Upper, lower, upper-Titan in the name.
  8. GoTitans3801 Forward Progress!

    Messages:
    7,640
    Moolah:
    $0
    You've done that a couple of times in the last few weeks.

    You were citing to RT to support a movie you liked, while criticizing it the week before. It's very inconsistent.
  9. Deuce Wayne They're ILLUSIONS, Michael!

    Martin
    Messages:
    24,048
    Moolah:
    $7,355
    Once again. I'm not citing RT to say the movie is good. I'm citing RT as a support for MY opinion. This isn't rocket science. YOU however were saying "well, RT says it's good, so it is!".
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page