This is a no-brainer to me. I'd take Eddie all day. He was a leader, a guy not afraid of anyone, a guy who got right up in Ray Lewis' face and talked **** to him. CJ is not a leader. CJ cannot push the pile forward. CJ cannot stiff arm anyone. CJ is a homerun hitter who, unfortunately, strikes out more than he hits homeruns. Eddie completely wore down the defense that by the 4th quarter the game was ours for the taking. CJ can't do this. Look at stats and you'll take CJ. Understand how the game works and how 3.5 yards on a consistent basis, driving the pile forward, stiff arming chumps, and getting in defenders faces is more important and you'll take Eddie. If you truly think CJ is better, I want to hear a great explanation because I haven't heard one yet. My friends like to compare YPC and base everything solely on that, while I'd take Eddie's 3.5 YPC over CJ's 5.0 YPC all day. I honestly find it strange that this is even a question that needs to be asked and that I'm outnumbered by a bunch of fools that are my friends, but hopefully the votes go my way in this one. PS this isn't an anti-CJ thread, so don't take it to be one.