Calvin Johnson Officially Declares...

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by BigRed3, Jan 8, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. The Playmaker

    The Playmaker pineapple pizza party

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    13,086
    There is plenty of talent at 19. I rather draft someone on defense anyway.
    #11
  2. Banshee2

    Banshee2 Guest

    I don't think we need a 1st round WR. IMHO, "defense wins championships" (yeah, I said it), and don't forget that there's a big FA signing in Dave Givens coming back next year. What I really wished for when I blew out my candles on my birthday cake this year was a ballhawking, hard-hitting FS to help Chris Hope out in the 2ndary.

    For our WR needs, I'd rather have someone with whom Vince already has chemistry, a la Snead from UT, though in a later round.
    #12
  3. Fry

    Fry Hatin' is what I do.

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2004
    Messages:
    26,454
    i agree, with where we're picking there wont be someone who will make an immediate impact at WR. dont hold your breath for givens to produce next year, he had a torn meniscus, torn ACL and a broken bone.

    limas sweed wont be in this draft, but if he were he'd probably be a second round pick.
    #13
  4. TNThunder

    TNThunder Guest

    We have plenty of WR's......thanks.
    #14
  5. Fry

    Fry Hatin' is what I do.

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2004
    Messages:
    26,454
    quantity over quality.

    we've got plenty of WRs, none of whom can do this...

    <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wXRqyjzyBRg"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wXRqyjzyBRg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
    #15
  6. i think hes the only one that can do that...
    #16
  7. BigRed3

    BigRed3 Straight Cash, Homey

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,214
    I made that catch once.... in a backyard game :ha:
    #17
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.